Hi Tony,
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got emails saying that roxterm 3.0.1-1 and then 3.0.2-1 were uploaded and
> the RFS bugs closed (the latter on 13 July), but the latest version showing
> up in the archives is still 2.9.5-1. Has something gone wrong with th
El 06/08/15 a las 16:12, Felix Natter escribió:
> I think it is very unlikely that this is due to a bug in uscan
> (also see "deleting 1 files from it." above).
yes maybe is a bug (very strange) in uscan
>
> Maybe you have an old "../syncterm-1.0.tgz" around?
> Can you try with a clean ".."?
Yes
Fernando Toledo writes:
> Hi
hello Fernando,
> i setup a watch file for my syncterm package that now is released on sf.net:
>
> version=3
> http://sf.net/syncterm/syncterm-(\d\S*)\.(?:zip|tgz|tbz|txz|(?:tar\.(?:gz|bz2|xz)))
>
> (the url of course is a one line)
>
> then use uscan --verbose --fo
Your message dated Thu, 06 Aug 2015 16:25:20 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: lintian/2.5.35 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #794540,
regarding RFS: lintian/2.5.35 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Well now it's public that I do not like cdbs :)
TBH I do not understand it, and the popcon is 1/5 of debhelper.
Two reasons to keep me away from it :)
cheers,
G.
Il Giovedì 6 Agosto 2015 17:18, Gianfranco Costamagna
ha scritto:
Hi Danny
(sending privately)
please do *not* use cdbs :)
It
Hi Danny
(sending privately)
please do *not* use cdbs :)
It will scare you away!
I do not like it, dh is really better, and fortunately people are switching to
dh :)
cheers,
G.
Il Giovedì 6 Agosto 2015 16:57, Danny Edel ha scritto:
Hello Gianfranco,
On 06/08/15 16:16, Gianfranco Costam
Hello Gianfranco,
On 06/08/15 16:16, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Reading symbols from /usr/bin/dspdfviewer...Reading symbols from
> /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c2/c35e6f96f063aff4e0d6e3e644855c31b11a0f.debug...done.
>
Ah yes, it says something like that for me now too, once I install
dspdfviewer
Hi Danny,
[upstream changes]
nice!
> "is the dbg package working? how can I verify?"
> (too lazy to quote you :) )
$ dpkg -i ../dspdfviewer_1.13.1-1_amd64.deb
[snip]
$ gdb /usr/bin/dspdfviewer
[snip]
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/dspdfviewer...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
$ dpk
Your message dated Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:26:53 + (UTC)
with message-id <1678008798.205611.1438871213184.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Package uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #794665,
regarding RFS: dspdfviewer/1.13-1 [ITP] -- Dual-screen PDF viewer for
latex-beamer pre
New version is on mentors.
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/filters/filters_2.54-1.dsc
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:03:09 +0200 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> According to debian/watch, upstream doesn't release tarballs. It would
> be great if they could be persuaded to start releasing them.
Hi,
I got emails saying that roxterm 3.0.1-1 and then 3.0.2-1 were uploaded
and the RFS bugs closed (the latter on 13 July), but the latest version
showing up in the archives is still 2.9.5-1. Has something gone wrong
with the upload?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists
On 05/08/15 17:10, Danny Edel wrote:
> I won't have it ready today, expect a revised package tomorrow.
While going through the changes, I actually stumbled upon a regression,
forcing me to release a bugfix/maintenance version v1.13.1 upstream.
I used the opportunity to do some cleaning:
* Create
12 matches
Mail list logo
