Hi,
again I have no idea how to fix this issue and need to ask some c++ experts.
Thanks for any help
Andreas.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:32:46AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:jellyfish
> Version: 2.1.4-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid stretch
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.
Your message dated Thu, 2 Jul 2015 20:27:40 +
with message-id
and subject line RE:Bug#790895: RFS: h5py/2.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #790895,
regarding RFS: h5py/2.5.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
uploaded
Fred
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b2172...@sun-dag3.synchrotron-soleil.fr
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
>
> * Package name: roxterm
>Version : 3.0.1-
Hi Tony,
Sorry, just saw your roxterm RFS and realized that I actually never
got back to you with your latest set of questions.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> That won't cause problems due to the reversed dependencies? One disadvantage
> I can foresee is that this will
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "h5py"
* Package name: h5py
Version : 2.5.0-1
Upstream Author : Andrew Colette
* URL : http://www.h5py.org/
* License : BSD
Section : python
It buil
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:27:21 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: linop/0.8.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #790785,
regarding RFS: linop/0.8.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:27:20 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: autoconf-archive/20150224-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #790300,
regarding RFS: autoconf-archive/20150224-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:27:22 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #790793,
regarding RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:27:20 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: pyzolib/0.3.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #790797,
regarding RFS: pyzolib/0.3.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On 02/07/15 13:24, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I can not find the changes for the release in question in Git.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Done. Pushed both branch and release tag.
Ghis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 15:11:34 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:36:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote:
> > >> Version : 0.12.0-1
> > > I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team
> > > reject.
> > Yes, but i've discussed this Julien (jc
Hi,
I can not find the changes for the release in question in Git.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debi
❦ 1 juillet 2015 12:52 +0200, Jakub Wilk :
>>So, should I:
>>
>>* Not remove the user on purge (as I have seen done in other packages)
>
> There seem to be consensus that system users should not be
> removed. Please see bug #621833 for details.
The thread is mostly dead and it seems that at so
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:36:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote:
> >> Version : 0.12.0-1
> > I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team reject.
> Yes, but i've discussed this Julien (jcristau) and we thought it was simpler
> to
> keep the same version, since I've m
On 07/01/2015 07:24 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:02:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote:
>> Version : 0.12.0-1
> I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team reject.
Yes, but i've discussed this Julien (jcristau) and we thought it was simpl
16 matches
Mail list logo
