On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Riley Baird wrote:
> Since it's a precompiled version of antlr, without source, does this
> change anything?
Indeed, the precompiled parts that are missing source will have to be
removed. Please also ask upstream to ship pristine source tarballs and
ship precompil
El 20/03/15 a las 16:54, Antti Järvinen escibió:
> Ragnarok wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "syncterm"
>
> Great. I'm no DD so I can't sponsor your package but I can give
> comments nonetheless. So, I have following things I don't understand:
> - Is there specific need to list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Randy Hollines writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "objeck-lang-amd64"
Great.
I'm no DD so I can't sponsor your package but I can give comments
regarding quality of your package.
- Question: looks like most of the compiler and ru
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 16:28:08 +0100
Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 22-03-15 06:39, Riley Baird wrote:
> > -The upstream tarball contains embedded code copies of the java
> > version of antlr, which violates Debian policy.
>
> This depends on the license, but in general this statement is not
> completely
Hello
I'm testing a change I made on the source package kde4libs but I'm
encountering a problem using cowbuilder in building the debian binary
package. To localize the problem I made a simple test case without
applying any changes in the source package.
If I compile the source package with:
$
On 22-03-15 06:39, Riley Baird wrote:
> -The upstream tarball contains embedded code copies of the java
> version of antlr, which violates Debian policy.
This depends on the license, but in general this statement is not
completely true.
> You'll need to repack
> the tarball and add +ds to the ver
6 matches
Mail list logo
