Bug#779486: RFS: pylama/6.2.0-1 [ITP]

2015-03-06 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 12:48:21PM +0100, Federico Gimenez wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pylama" > > * Package name: pylama >Version : 6.2.0-1 >Upstream Author : Kirill Klenov > *

Bug#779667: RFS: node-bluebird/2.9.13+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2015-03-06 Thread Ross Gammon
On 03/04/2015 11:47 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Thanks for the fixes. I've pushed some more changes for various things > I encountered. Thanks for those. Using npm2deb for the first time made me miss some of my normal steps. > > Did you notice that the upstream build process requires itse

Bug#779377: Changelog bug closing in classified-ads

2015-03-06 Thread Riley Baird
Oh, and I forgot to mention: The bug you close in d/changelog should be the ITP, not the RFS. The RFS will be closed automatically once the ITP is closed. pgpTpT7nOdACw.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#779377: Fw: Re: Bug#779377: RFS: classified-ads/0.03-1 / ITP

2015-03-06 Thread Riley Baird
> So, does it look any better now? Yes, a lot better! You're almost there, but just two more things: -Add a d/source/format containing the only the string "3.0 (quilt)" (without the quotation marks). This ensures that your package will use the new format for any patches you may make in future. -

Bug#774120: marked as done (RFS: libjson-rpc-cpp/0.4.1-2 [ITP])

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 Mar 2015 09:19:13 +0100 with message-id <54f96301.4000...@autistici.org> and subject line closing bug has caused the Debian Bug report #774120, regarding RFS: libjson-rpc-cpp/0.4.1-2 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi