> Now btpd is not in Debian. Where can I find what happened to it,
> can I revive it and where is last debianization repository?
From this bug, it seems that it never was in Debian at all:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/158447
The links to the repositories are contained in the above repor
Hello!
I wanted to package `btpd` (git://github.com/btpd/btpd.git).
`querybts` says nothing, but I found ubuntu package which is
based on Debian packaging from times of standards 3.9.0.
Now btpd is not in Debian. Where can I find what happened to it,
can I revive it and where is last debianizatio
//pub.sebian.fr/pub/task_2.4.1%2Bdfsg-1_amd64-20150301-2253.build
(...)
[ 98%] make[4]: Entering directory
'/home/tobi/workspace/deb/mentors/task/task-2.4.1/obj'
make[4]: Nothing to be done for 'test/CMakeFiles/eval.t.dir/build'.
make[4]: Leaving directory
'/
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:04:28AM (+0100), Tobias Frost wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
Thanks for adopting the package. I will sponsor your upload.
(However, I cannot do it now, but I will do a througouh review tonight or
tomorrow)
Hi Tobias,
Sorry for the delay, and many thanks for the review and va
Your message dated Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:57:35 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: jabberd2/2.2.17+dfsg1-1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #765518,
regarding RFS: jabberd2/2.2.17+dfsg1-1 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:57:39 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: webalizer/2.23.08-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #764776,
regarding RFS: webalizer/2.23.08-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:57:34 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: sfarklib/2.23+20131219gitee08d0c-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #768878,
regarding RFS: sfarklib/2.23+20131219gitee08d0c-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:57:37 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: sfarkxtc/0~20130812git80b1da3-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #768879,
regarding RFS: sfarkxtc/0~20130812git80b1da3-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:57:34 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: 4pane/3.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #764520,
regarding RFS: 4pane/3.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:57:34 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: libjs-zxcvbn/1.0+dfsg.2-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #764822,
regarding RFS: libjs-zxcvbn/1.0+dfsg.2-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Am Samstag, den 28.02.2015, 18:05 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier:
> On 2015-02-28 16:37, Daniel Stender wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I've got the official Python logo image [1] here in a package.
> >
> > 1) what would be the proper license for that file in deb/copyright?
> >
> > 2) what's the best
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pylama"
* Package name: pylama
Version : 6.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Kirill Klenov
* URL : https://github.com/klen/pylama
* License : LGPL-3
Section
Am Samstag, den 28.02.2015, 17:17 +0200 schrieb Antti Järvinen:
> Tobias Frost writes:
> > Am Samstag, den 28.02.2015, 12:16 +1100 schrieb Riley Baird:
> ..
> > should fix them, also please read https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
> > -- you definitly need to separate upstream source and debia
13 matches
Mail list logo
