Bug#777146: Fiona does not build

2015-02-05 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
>> Also fiona requires a recent version of Cython, so building under >> jessie is not possible without further tweaking. > > jessie & sid have the same cython version, so it should work. The wheezy > version is not sufficient though. Interesting. In that case it got a freeze exception. When I las

Bug#777146: Fiona does not build

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 02/05/2015 10:33 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > It works for me in unstable. You will need a recent update of unstable > as fiona relies on python-cligj which was only added yesterday. You don't need to have python-cligj installed locally to build the package with pbuilder, you do need cython a

Bug#777146: Fiona does not build

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 02/05/2015 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I: pybuild base:170: python3.4 setup.py clean > WARNING:root:Failed to get options via gdal-config: [Errno 2] No such file or > directory: 'gdal-config' > CRITICAL:root:Cython.Build.cythonize not found. Cython is required to build > from a repo. > E

Bug#777146: Fiona does not build

2015-02-05 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Strange, gdal-config (libgdal-dev) and cython are in the control file. Something strange seems to be happening in that pbuilder. It works for me in unstable. You will need a recent update of unstable as fiona relies on python-cligj which was only added yesterday. Also fiona requires a recent ver

Bug#777146: Fiona does not build

2015-02-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Johan, when trying to build fiona I get: ... Cythonizing fiona/ogrext.pyx /usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py:267: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'metadata_version' warnings.warn(msg) /usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py:267: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'requires_

Bug#776795: marked as done (RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30932+ds1-1~exp1)

2015-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 05 Feb 2015 18:36:59 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30932+ds1-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #776795, regarding RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30932+ds1-1~exp1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#761687: marked as done (RFS: abraca/0.8.0+dfsg-1 -- Simple and powerful graphical client for XMMS2)

2015-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 05 Feb 2015 18:36:55 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: abraca/0.8.0+dfsg-1 -- Simple and powerful graphical client for XMMS2 has caused the Debian Bug report #761687, regarding RFS: abraca/0.8.0+dfsg-1 -- Simple and powerful graphical client for XMMS2 to

Bug#777146: RFS: fiona/1.5.0-1 [ITP]

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 02/05/2015 06:39 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > [...] I'll leave it at this. Famous last words. There is just one more thing. The doc-base control file has an unusual suffix: .docbase instead of .doc-base. It also uses an unusual Document ID: fiona.docbase, using the (source) package name

Bug#777146: RFS: fiona/1.5.0-1 [ITP]

2015-02-05 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Johan, Thanks for your work on fiona and related packages! Some comments regarding the package based on my review. lintian reported two issues with the copyright file, both having the same cause: I: fiona source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright docs/data/tests/data/* (paragraph at

Re: Keep built files between pdebuild

2015-02-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
If the several hours are spent compiling with gcc (likely), another option is ccache; this is a little slower, but works across pbuilder sessions (though deliberately not gcc upgrades, common in sid), and is less likely to break things by reusing files it shouldn't (as it requires the compiler opt

Bug#777146: RFS: fiona/1.5.0-1 [ITP]

2015-02-05 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fiona" Package name: fiona Version : 1.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Sean Gillies URL : https://github.com/Tobleri

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-05 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 05/02/2015 14:50, Corentin Desfarges a écrit : > Le 05/02/2015 11:40, Andreas Tille a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:50:15AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda >> wrote: By the way, we have to add "wget" as build-deps of the package in d/control. >>> No, it's the lack of

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-05 Thread Corentin Desfarges
Le 05/02/2015 11:40, Andreas Tille a écrit : Hi, On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:50:15AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: By the way, we have to add "wget" as build-deps of the package in d/control. No, it's the lack of wget as build dependency. I'm trying to build again the package. I have

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-05 Thread Corentin Desfarges
Le 05/02/2015 13:39, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit : El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 11:09:23, Corentin Desfarges va escriure: Le 05/02/2015 10:50, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit : El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 10:24:25, Corentin Desfarges va escriure: Are you sure that i

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-05 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 11:09:23, Corentin Desfarges va escriure: > Le 05/02/2015 10:50, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit : > > El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 10:24:25, Corentin Desfarges va > > > > escriure: > >>> Are you sure that in build time do you need to download some

Re: odd Vcs-Git pointer in control file, package fortune-zh

2015-02-05 Thread lumin
Thank you for advise, Russ Allbery and Paul Wise. I'll try it later :) -- Regards, C.D.Luminate -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1423134462.2546.1

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:50:15AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > By the way, we have to add "wget" as build-deps of the package in d/control. > > No, it's the lack of wget as build dependency. I'm trying to build again the > package. I have made some modifications, but I would

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-05 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 05/02/2015 10:24, Corentin Desfarges a écrit : >> Are you sure that in build time do you need to download some data? is >> this >> acceptable? >> >> Leopold > > Yes I need to download the data, else the unit tests can't pass... And I > can't > include the data into the package, because of its t

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-05 Thread Corentin Desfarges
Le 05/02/2015 10:50, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda a écrit : El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 10:24:25, Corentin Desfarges va escriure: Are you sure that in build time do you need to download some data? is this acceptable? Leopold Yes I need to download the data, else the unit tests can't pas

Re: Keep built files between pdebuild

2015-02-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > I have a simple question : Is there a way to keep the files got with the > command pdebuild when we launch a new build with pdebuild, to save time > when we work on very big packages which last hours ? I would add a pair of identical hoo

Keep built files between pdebuild

2015-02-05 Thread Corentin Desfarges
Dear Mentors, I have a simple question : Is there a way to keep the files got with the command pdebuild when we launch a new build with pdebuild, to save time when we work on very big packages which last hours ? Same thing about about the "debuild" command. I know the "-nc" option, but if I make

Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-05 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dijous, 5 de febrer de 2015, a les 10:24:25, Corentin Desfarges va escriure: > > Are you sure that in build time do you need to download some data? is this > > acceptable? > > > > Leopold > > Yes I need to download the data, else the unit tests can't pass... And I > can't include the data int

Re: Re: Useless call to ldconfig and shared libraries issue

2015-02-05 Thread Corentin Desfarges
Are you sure that in build time do you need to download some data? is this acceptable? Leopold Yes I need to download the data, else the unit tests can't pass... And I can't include the data into the package, because of its the size (more than 800MB). It has already been discussed in this thre