Bug#753980: marked as done (RFS: rhash-bindings/1.3.3-1)

2014-12-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Dec 2014 04:26:59 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: rhash-bindings/1.3.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #753980, regarding RFS: rhash-bindings/1.3.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Re: Bug#773505: python-descartes/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

2014-12-22 Thread Riley Baird
On 19/12/14 20:47, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for reviews/a sponsor for my package "python-descartes" > > * Package name: python-descartes >V

Re: Bug#773760: RFS: kcm-systemd/0.7.0-1 [ITP]

2014-12-22 Thread Riley Baird
On 23/12/14 10:56, Shawn Sörbom wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kcm-systemd" > > * Package name: kcm-systemd >Version : 0.7.0-1 >Upstream Author : Ragnar Thomsen > * URL

Bug#773760: RFS: kcm-systemd/0.7.0-1 [ITP]

2014-12-22 Thread Shawn Sörbom
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kcm-systemd" * Package name: kcm-systemd Version : 0.7.0-1 Upstream Author : Ragnar Thomsen * URL : https://github.com/rthomsen/kcmsystemd * License

Re: Bug#773632: RFS: pcsx2/1.2.1-783-g1f54bb7+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2014-12-22 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 06:27:44 +1100, Riley Baird wrote: > > Testing migration for packages not in testing still is 10 days. > > Cf. > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/11/msg7.html > > ("Default Urgency"); maybe that's what Riley's mentor had in mind. > Ah, okay, thanks. Sh

Re: Bug#773632: RFS: pcsx2/1.2.1-783-g1f54bb7+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2014-12-22 Thread Riley Baird
On 22/12/14 23:40, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:50:59 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 09:30:45PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote: > * In d/changelog, urgency should be "low" since it's a new > package Is this documented somewhere? >>> My ment

Re: Bug#773632: RFS: pcsx2/1.2.1-783-g1f54bb7+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2014-12-22 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:50:59 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 09:30:45PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote: > > >> * In d/changelog, urgency should be "low" since it's a new > > >> package > > > Is this documented somewhere? > > My mentor had told me upon the second upload of my p

Re: Bug#773611: Fwd: RFS: histring/1.1.1-1 [ITP] - general purpose highlighting tool

2014-12-22 Thread Riley Baird
* It may be a good idea to make releases as tarballs still, instead of just making Debian releases, so that other distros can benefit as well. >>> >>> Alternatively, he/she can tag the releases in git. >> >> True, that would also work. (Although it has the disadvantage that it >> mak

Re: Bug#773632: RFS: pcsx2/1.2.1-783-g1f54bb7+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2014-12-22 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 09:30:45PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote: > >> * In d/changelog, urgency should be "low" since it's a new > >> package > > Is this documented somewhere? > > My mentor had told me upon the second upload of my package that I > could optionally change the priority to medium (and th

Re: Bug#773632: RFS: pcsx2/1.2.1-783-g1f54bb7+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2014-12-22 Thread Riley Baird
On 22/12/14 01:08, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 09:03:51PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote: >> * In d/changelog, urgency should be "low" since it's a new >> package > Is this documented somewhere? My mentor had told me upon the second upload of my package that I could optionally ch

Re: Bug#773632: RFS: pcsx2/1.2.1-783-g1f54bb7+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2014-12-22 Thread Riley Baird
>> * There's a newer upstream version > > The package contains the HEAD of the master branch from a few hours > ago since upstream just committed some new changes. There is > technically no newer version. What upstream branched/tagged as 1.2.2 > is 1.2.1 + a cherry pick of 1 commit but due to the