Your message dated Tue, 23 Dec 2014 04:26:59 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: rhash-bindings/1.3.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #753980,
regarding RFS: rhash-bindings/1.3.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On 19/12/14 20:47, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for reviews/a sponsor for my package "python-descartes"
>
> * Package name: python-descartes
>V
On 23/12/14 10:56, Shawn Sörbom wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kcm-systemd"
>
> * Package name: kcm-systemd
>Version : 0.7.0-1
>Upstream Author : Ragnar Thomsen
> * URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kcm-systemd"
* Package name: kcm-systemd
Version : 0.7.0-1
Upstream Author : Ragnar Thomsen
* URL : https://github.com/rthomsen/kcmsystemd
* License
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 06:27:44 +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
> > Testing migration for packages not in testing still is 10 days.
> > Cf.
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/11/msg7.html
> > ("Default Urgency"); maybe that's what Riley's mentor had in mind.
> Ah, okay, thanks. Sh
On 22/12/14 23:40, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:50:59 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 09:30:45PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
> * In d/changelog, urgency should be "low" since it's a new
> package
Is this documented somewhere?
>>> My ment
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:50:59 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 09:30:45PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
> > >> * In d/changelog, urgency should be "low" since it's a new
> > >> package
> > > Is this documented somewhere?
> > My mentor had told me upon the second upload of my p
* It may be a good idea to make releases as tarballs still, instead of
just making Debian releases, so that other distros can benefit as
well.
>>>
>>> Alternatively, he/she can tag the releases in git.
>>
>> True, that would also work. (Although it has the disadvantage that it
>> mak
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 09:30:45PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
> >> * In d/changelog, urgency should be "low" since it's a new
> >> package
> > Is this documented somewhere?
>
> My mentor had told me upon the second upload of my package that I
> could optionally change the priority to medium (and th
On 22/12/14 01:08, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 09:03:51PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
>> * In d/changelog, urgency should be "low" since it's a new
>> package
> Is this documented somewhere?
My mentor had told me upon the second upload of my package that I
could optionally ch
>> * There's a newer upstream version
>
> The package contains the HEAD of the master branch from a few hours
> ago since upstream just committed some new changes. There is
> technically no newer version. What upstream branched/tagged as 1.2.2
> is 1.2.1 + a cherry pick of 1 commit but due to the
11 matches
Mail list logo