Bug#771764: RFS: moreutils/0.54-1 [ITA]

2014-12-01 Thread Nicolas Schier
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "moreutils" * Package name: moreutils Version : 0.54-1 Upstream Author : Joey Hess * URL : http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/moreutils * License : GPL-2+, E

Bug#771353: marked as done (RFS: librasterlite2/1.0.0~rc0-1~exp1 [ITP])

2014-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 02 Dec 2014 04:26:27 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: librasterlite2/1.0.0~rc0-1~exp1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #771353, regarding RFS: librasterlite2/1.0.0~rc0-1~exp1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Re: Lawyer.com Referral Preference Request (120120141912053316)

2014-12-01 Thread Lawyer.com Support
Greetings Mr. Rice, Thank you for contacting Lawyer.com. I have validated your request and updated your free listing, please view your updated profile here: http://www.lawyer.com/philip-robert-rice.html If you are looking for increased online presence, and preferential access to our Referral Ser

Bug#770239: marked as done (RFS: digikam/4:2.6.0-1+deb7u1 [RC][NMU])

2014-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 1 Dec 2014 17:42:30 -0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#770239: RFS: digikam/4:2.6.0-1+deb7u1 [RC][NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #770239, regarding RFS: digikam/4:2.6.0-1+deb7u1 [RC][NMU] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#770239: RFS: digikam/4:2.6.0-1+deb7u1 [RC][NMU]

2014-12-01 Thread Eriberto Mota
tags 769668 pending thanks Hi all, I uploaded the NMU for digikam, made by Jean-Michel, with 10-day delay. Thanks. Regards, Eriberto 2014-11-27 11:37 GMT-02:00 Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère : > The fix has reached Jessie[1], and wheezy-pu is ok for the Release Team[2]. > > You can upload witho

Bug#771006: marked as done (RFS: libgeotiff-dfsg/1.4.1-1~exp1)

2014-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:26:53 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libgeotiff-dfsg/1.4.1-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #771006, regarding RFS: libgeotiff-dfsg/1.4.1-1~exp1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#771007: marked as done (RFS: libgeotiff-epsg/1.4.1-1~exp1)

2014-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:26:53 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libgeotiff-epsg/1.4.1-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #771007, regarding RFS: libgeotiff-epsg/1.4.1-1~exp1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#771351: marked as done (RFS: spatialite-tools/4.2.1~rc1-1)

2014-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:26:53 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: spatialite-tools/4.2.1~rc1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #771351, regarding RFS: spatialite-tools/4.2.1~rc1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#771350: marked as done (RFS: spatialite/4.2.1~rc1-1~exp1)

2014-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:26:53 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: spatialite/4.2.1~rc1-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #771350, regarding RFS: spatialite/4.2.1~rc1-1~exp1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Re: Big data is needed for unit test

2014-12-01 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le lundi 01 décembre 2014 à 17:28 +0100, Johannes Schauer a écrit : > Hi, > > Quoting Paul Wise (2014-12-01 17:03:39) > > > Should I simply remove this test, or can I include the data file in the > > > package ? > > > > Can you include more details about this data file? > > > > What data format

Re: Big data is needed for unit test

2014-12-01 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Paul Wise (2014-12-01 17:03:39) > > Should I simply remove this test, or can I include the data file in the > > package ? > > Can you include more details about this data file? > > What data format is the file in? depending on the answer to this question it might be very simple to c

Re: Big data is needed for unit test

2014-12-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > I'm working on the packaging of fw4spl (a medical software), and I'm faced > with a new problematic : One of the unit tests needs to load an important > data file, which has a big size (~200 Mo). I assume you mean 200MB here. > Should

Big data is needed for unit test

2014-12-01 Thread Corentin Desfarges
Dear Mentors, I'm working on the packaging of fw4spl (a medical software), and I'm faced with a new problematic : One of the unit tests needs to load an important data file, which has a big size (~200 Mo). Should I simply remove this test, or can I include the data file in the package ? Thank

Re: Self-maintained Debian packages best practice

2014-12-01 Thread Tim Ruehsen
On Sunday 30 November 2014 20:32:26 T o n g wrote: > On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 18:12:06 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > >> > In the past, having a `debian/` directory upstream was a pain because > >> > we didn't have a proper way to remove a file if needed. Nowadays, it > >> > is perfectly fine if you use