Re: Packaging multiple version of cakephp

2014-11-16 Thread Maxime Chatelle
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:31:04AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Maxime Chatelle wrote: > > > The three branches should be co-installable. So, each package will want > > to install itself into /usr/share/php. To avoid names clashes, I think > > using a subdirectory by

Bug#769688: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-sqlclient/1.8.1-1 -- SQL client library for GNUstep)

2014-11-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Nov 2014 04:23:39 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: gnustep-sqlclient/1.8.1-1 -- SQL client library for GNUstep has caused the Debian Bug report #769688, regarding RFS: gnustep-sqlclient/1.8.1-1 -- SQL client library for GNUstep to be marked as done.

Re: Packaging multiple version of cakephp

2014-11-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Maxime Chatelle wrote: > The three branches should be co-installable. So, each package will want > to install itself into /usr/share/php. To avoid names clashes, I think > using a subdirectory by package and with a patch in the app templates to > fix the include p

Bug#768878: RFS: sfarklib/0.20131219gitee08d0c-1 [ITP]

2014-11-16 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi, Then I've added d/gbp.conf and watch files to both packages. You may have a new look now. Thanks for telling about the problems. Ruben 2014-11-16 20:33 GMT+01:00 Ruben Undheim : > Hi Ross, > >> This looks like a good little package (and its partner), and I would be >> happy to be a co-uplo

Bug#768878: RFS: sfarklib/0.20131219gitee08d0c-1 [ITP]

2014-11-16 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi Ross, > This looks like a good little package (and its partner), and I would be > happy to be a co-uploader within the Debian Multimedia Team. I am nearly > a DM, but I cannot sponsor the package. Great! I will add you to the uploaders field. > Unfortunately I fell at the first hurdle when ta

Bug#767372: Reassigning to pantomime

2014-11-16 Thread Yavor Doganov
intrigeri wrote: > Yavor Doganov wrote (30 Oct 2014 11:59:26 GMT) : > > An attempt to contact the original authors of GNUMail and LuserNET > > for request for relicensing under GPL + OpenSSL exception has > > failed, so the problem will be solved in the library by switching > > to GnuTLS. > > * th

Packaging multiple version of cakephp

2014-11-16 Thread Maxime Chatelle
I'm adopting cakephp. Upstream maintains three branchs: * the 1.3.x series which receives only bugfixes. * the 2.x series which is actively maintained. * and the future 3.x series (coming soon). For each series, backward compatibility with previous versions in the series is usually maintained.

Bug#769810: RFS: phamm/0.6.2-1.1 [RC][NMU]

2014-11-16 Thread Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phamm" It builds those binary packages: phamm - PHP front-end to manage virtual services on LDAP - main package phamm-ldap - PHP front-end to manage virtual services on LDAP - bac

Bug#767372: Reassigning to pantomime

2014-11-16 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Yavor Doganov wrote (30 Oct 2014 11:59:26 GMT) : > An attempt to contact the original authors of GNUMail and LuserNET for > request for relicensing under GPL + OpenSSL exception has failed, so > the problem will be solved in the library by switching to GnuTLS. [Looking at it since it's a RC b

Re: Depends on exact version

2014-11-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
Daniel Lintott wrote: > I have a package which is split into two sources (a server and gui). The > server version should match the gui version (upstream version) at all times. > Because of this when I'm creating the meta-package that will depend on > both the gui and server, should be versioned t

Re: How to solve a FTBFS caused by Build-Depends being removed from the archive?

2014-11-16 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 05:51:06PM -0800, Cameron Norman wrote: > The bug in question is here: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768671 > > jenkins build depends on libjson-java, a package that was removed due > to being suspected of containing non-free code (the JSON "For good,