Hi Jörg,
I looked into the scons package at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scons/scons_2.3.4-1.dsc and
copy this review to d-mentors for others to join in. Here are some
comments in random order. Importance at end of mail.
1. Earlier reviewers have observed that you are using compre
Hi all,
Although I'm currently not directly working towards getting packages
into Debian I do hope to eventually so hope this isn't OT.
I have been reading and playing with package building and looking for
the 'best' way to do this. Obviously that is open to discussion but
git-buildpackage seems
Hi all,
Although I'm currently not directly working towards getting packages
into Debian I do hope to eventually so hope this isn't OT.
I have been reading and playing with package building and looking for
the 'best' way to do this. Obviously that is open to discussion but
git-buildpackage seems
Hi Eriberto,
I found time to work on kcm-ufw this week.
I manually rechecked (and documented) all the source tree files for copyrights
and cross-checked against your previous e-mails.
I also consulted here just to be extra safe:
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#f
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdal"
Package name: gdal
Version : 1.11.1+dfsg-1~exp2
Upstream Author : The GDAL/OGR project team, Frank Warmerdam
URL : http://www.gdal.org/
License : M
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 04:53:42PM +0100, basti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know that this can be a bit off-topic.
> When I try to build a package based on git and use
>
> git-buildpackage => docs are not include in deb-file.
> dpkg-buildpackage => docs ARE include in deb-file.
>
> dh_installdocs is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fasm":
* Package name: fasm
Version : 1.71.22-1
Upstream Author : Tomasz Grysztar
* URL : http://flatassembler.net
* License : FASM license (Simp
Your message dated Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:23:35 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: geographiclib/1.37-3 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #768358,
regarding RFS: geographiclib/1.37-3 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Hello,
I know that this can be a bit off-topic.
When I try to build a package based on git and use
git-buildpackage => docs are not include in deb-file.
dpkg-buildpackage => docs ARE include in deb-file.
dh_installdocs is included in rules at anytime.
Regards,
Basti
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Greetings Mr. Rice,
Thank you for contacting Lawyer.com.
I have validated your request and updated your free listing, please view
your updated profile here:
If you are looking for increased online presence, and preferential access
to our Referral Service, I recommend taking a look at our Pr
Uploaded. Thanks for your work.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-11-07 10:33 GMT-02:00 Pierre Rudloff :
> Hello,
>
> This is your first answer to my last email and I still need a sponsor for
> this package.
> Thanks for your time.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> On 07/11/2014 13:21, Eriberto wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I
Your message dated Fri, 7 Nov 2014 10:40:11 -0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #757966,
regarding RFS: lutris/0.3.5-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Hello,
This is your first answer to my last email and I still need a sponsor
for this package.
Thanks for your time.
Regards,
On 07/11/2014 13:21, Eriberto wrote:
Hi,
I am lost in my time and my emails. So, I would like to know if I
replied you before and if you needs a sponsor yet.
Sorry
Hi,
I am lost in my time and my emails. So, I would like to know if I
replied you before and if you needs a sponsor yet.
Sorry for my delay.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-10-16 18:42 GMT-03:00 Pierre Rudloff :
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for not answering before, I had quite a lot of work.
> I have upadated t
* Rebecca N. Palmer , 2014-11-07, 08:01:
The + scheme is obsolete. If anything, it should be
"-3+deb8u1".
Documentation: last paragraph of Developer's Reference §5.11.2.
5.13.3 (t-p-u) still has the old scheme: is that a bug in
developers-reference?
Well spotted! I've just filed #768426.
Sorry, I made a big error below:
> You'll need sources for everything and rebuild everything from source.
> (Don't know about flash packaging, if that is possible at all. )
> If the swf are not required for functioning, you could also packge them as a
> separate package (non-free) and only Recomme
PS: Sorry, I missed your RFH in the subject. (put those information in the
body, please)
Away from my dev machine, I can only give remote ideas without checking the
code.
Regarding the lintian errors:
license-problem-md5sum-non-free-file
Consider removing those files, preferable by a Files-Excl
> Hi,
>Sorry for the confusion. The DB1.LITE is licensed under the creative
> commons. The license file inside the archive has been updated.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>Chris
>
:-) thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Mathieu Malaterre [2014-11-06 18:10 +0100]:
>> [CC me please]
>>
>> I am trying to make CharLS a true multiarch capable package. However I
>> fail to understand what I did wrong.
>>
>> Steps:
>> $ apt-get source charls
>> $ cd charls-1.0
>> $ vim
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> * Mathieu Malaterre , 2014-11-06, 18:10:
>>
>> [CC me please]
>
>
> [done!]
>
>> $ sudo apt-get upgrade
>> Reading package lists... Done
>> Building dependency tree
>> Reading state information... Done
>> You might want to run 'ap
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hastymail2"
>
> * Package name: hastymail2
>Version : 1.1-1
>Upstream Author : Jason Munro ja...@hastymail.org
> * URL :
The + scheme is obsolete. If anything, it should be "-3+deb8u1".
Documentation: last paragraph of Developer's Reference §5.11.2.
5.13.3 (t-p-u) still has the old scheme: is that a bug in
developers-reference?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
22 matches
Mail list logo
