Your message dated Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:23:42 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: gnustep-dl2/0.12.0-13 -- GNUstep database library
[RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #767264,
regarding RFS: gnustep-dl2/0.12.0-13 -- GNUstep database library [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 30 Oct 2014 04:23:42 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: gnustep-netclasses/1.06.dfsg-7 -- GNUstep
framework for socket programming [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #767259,
regarding RFS: gnustep-netclasses/1.06.dfsg-7 -- GNUstep framework for socket
Your message dated Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:06:09 +0100
with message-id <20141030010609.gb2...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#766244: RFS: dwb/20140702hg-1.1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #766244,
regarding RFS: dwb/20140702hg-1.1 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Riley Baird
wrote:
> On 29/10/14 19:55, Richard van den Berg wrote:
>> On 28-10-14 20:59 , Riley Baird wrote:
>>> As far as I can tell, your code ensures that even if the strings are of
>>> different length, an equality calculation should be performed anyway,
>>> h
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-affine"
* Package name: python-affine
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Sean Gillies,
* URL : http
Your message dated Wed, 29 Oct 2014 22:22:17 +0100
with message-id <1414617737.2122.1.ca...@frost.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#766148: RFS: sleepenh/1.3.2 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #766148,
regarding RFS: sleepenh/1.3-2 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
On 30/10/14 01:34, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
> Hi Riley
>
> Suppose the strings are 10k bytes each (10240), but they differ at byte zero,
> where is the break instruction to stop the compare?
Why would there need to be a break instruction? That would mean that the
time taken to compare strings
On 29/10/14 19:55, Richard van den Berg wrote:
> On 28-10-14 20:59 , Riley Baird wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, your code ensures that even if the strings are of
>> different length, an equality calculation should be performed anyway,
>> however returning 0, on the grounds that this would make it
Your message dated Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:21:52 +0100
with message-id <20141029192152.ga3...@hermes.rxsoft.eu>
and subject line Canceling RFS
has caused the Debian Bug report #766852,
regarding RFS: cronolog/1.6.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pacpl"
* Package name: pacpl
Version : 4.0.5-8
Upstream Author : Philip Lyons
* URL : http://pacpl.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-3+
Section
On 27.10.2014 18:29, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:04:57 +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote:
On 26.10.2014 15:27, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
* Patch work:
- Add from Fedora: dwb-gtk-deprecated.patch --fix FTBFS.
(Closes: #763220)
Okay. Please send a message to #763220
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-dl2".
It builds these binary packages:
gnustep-dl2 - Objective-C Classes needed for Database Access
gnustep-dl2-postgresql-adaptor - gnustep-dl2 adaptor to connect to PostgreSQL
gnu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-netclasses".
It builds these binary packages:
libnetclasses-dev - Objective-C framework for socket programming with GNUstep
(devel)
libnetclasses0 - Objective-C framework for socke
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zeal"
* Package name: zeal
Version : 0~20141027-1
Upstream Author : 2013-2014 Jerzy Kozera
* URL : http://zealdocs.org/
* License : GPL-3+, LGPL-2.1+, G
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "addresses-for-gnustep". The
package has a lot of lintian warnings and is generally in a poor shape.
Most issues are fixed in the master branch but they're not applicable
for jessie. This r
So, with a little bit more work, I was able to produce a version passing
all QA tests on mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/bsdowl
There were more warning than lintian (called from debuild) shown me.
Which tool can I use to detect at least as many QA problems as mentors did?
Regards,
Mi
On 29/10/14 17:00, Joel Rees wrote:
> 2014/10/29 4:59 "Riley Baird" <
> bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch>:
>>
>> On 29/10/14 00:20, Joel Rees wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Riley Baird
>>> wrote:
Dear debian-security,
I am looking for a sponsor for m
17 matches
Mail list logo
