On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 14:01 +1100, Carl Suster wrote:
> I'm not sure what you're referring to here - `licensecheck
> --copyright` and grep both seem to agree with the information in
> d/copyright with only two differences: (1) I changed the aliases in
> the copyright headers to the contributors' f
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Paul,
Thanks very much for the thorough review.
> This looks like the only thing that would block the upload:
>
> Some of the copyright holders are missing from debian/copyright.
I'm not sure what you're referring to here - `licensecheck --copyright` and
grep bo
Am Montag, den 27.10.2014, 10:52 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Schier:
> Dear Tobi,
>
> thanks for reviewing and sponsoring! Especially the
> native-vs-non-native link was quite enlightening.
>
> A few minutes ago I uploaded the new files
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sleepenh
Greetings Mr. Rice,
Thank you for contacting Lawyer.com.
I have validated your request and updated your free listing, please view
your updated profile here: http://www.lawyer.com/philip-robert-rice.html
If you are looking for increased online presence, and preferential access
to our Referral Ser
* Johannes Schauer , 2014-10-27, 13:59:
spellintian[0] says:
NEWS: overriden -> overridden
NEWS: allows to -> allows one to
README.md: overriden -> overridden
README.md: allows to -> allows one to
I take it spellintian is not packaged?
Nope. Maybe you^Wwe could talk Lintian maintainers to inc
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:04:57 +0100, Mateusz Ĺukasik wrote:
> On 26.10.2014 15:27, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >> * Patch work:
> >> - Add from Fedora: dwb-gtk-deprecated.patch --fix FTBFS.
> >> (Closes: #763220)
> >Okay. Please send a message to #763220 saying that there is a patch
> >a
Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:23:48 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: openbox/3.5.2-8 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #766842,
regarding RFS: openbox/3.5.2-8 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:23:48 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: gtk-theme-switch/2.1.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #766682,
regarding RFS: gtk-theme-switch/2.1.0-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:23:48 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #763615,
regarding RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:23:50 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: ibus-libzhuyin/1.6.99.20140929-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #766470,
regarding RFS: ibus-libzhuyin/1.6.99.20140929-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Although I don't know whether I should upload this change
> due to the upcoming freeze
The release team might be willing to unblock such a change.
BTW, could the default for cme check dpkg not show progress/debug info?
--
bye,
pabs
h
On Monday 27 October 2014 23:26:10 Paul Wise wrote:
> Cannot find license text for BSD-3-clause
Bummer. That's a message coming from Software::License which cannot find
license text in the system. Software::License does not scan debian/copyright.
This message is irrelevant and must be confusing
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Carl Suster wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "plowshare4"
I don't intend to sponsor this but here is a review.
This looks like the only thing that would block the upload:
Some of the copyright holders are missing from debian/copyright.
These t
Hmm, perhaps I misinterpret [1], but it says "on the 5th of November
2014, and we will run one automated migration at that time".
...under the existing automated migration rules, including the 10-day
rule (so anything uploaded now won't qualify). "Unlike the Wheezy
freeze, we are not planning t
New upstream versions uploaded now generally won't get into Jessie, as
the now-required 10-day delay is longer than the time remaining before
freeze.
As the preferred way to do bug fixes during the freeze is to upload them
to unstable, having a new upstream version sitting in unstable during a
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:37:31PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> In general Debian expects sponsored package maintainers to be
> proactive about finding sponsors; contacting former sponsors,
Sure, I like waste my time for Debian's bureacracy)
> working on their packages
I did this for ~3 years, unt
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> is there any chance for this package [1] to enter Jessie after
> ~1 year sitting on mentors.d.n?! (see #739247 about the
> privacy-breach-google-cse lintian error)
>
> If no, what exactly I should do?
In general Debian expects sponsore
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "plowshare4"
Package name : plowshare4
Version : 1.0.6-1
Upstream Author : Matthieu Crapet
URL : https://code.google.com/p/plowshare/
Licence : GPL-3+
Section : web
It builds thos
reopen 738101
thanks
Hello,
is there any chance for this package [1] to enter Jessie after
~1 year sitting on mentors.d.n?! (see #739247 about the
privacy-breach-google-cse lintian error)
If no, what exactly I should do?
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/awstats
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
[I don't intend to sponsor this package, sorry!]
* Johannes Schauer , 2014-10-26, 09:01:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fuzzylite/fuzzylite_5.0+dfsg-1.dsc
codespell says:
./fuzzylite/src/term/Function.cpp:578: Oxigen ==> Oxygen
./fuzzylite/src/term/Function.cpp:579: Oxigen ==>
Andreas Moog writes:
> It seems to be missing a build-depends on (at least) the autoconf package.
Oops. I've fixed this and set up cowbuilder to avoid future problems.
The new version is on mentors.
--
Marius Gavrilescu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Dear Tobi,
thanks for reviewing and sponsoring! Especially the
native-vs-non-native link was quite enlightening.
A few minutes ago I uploaded the new files
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sleepenh/sleepenh_1.3-2.dsc
including the following changes:
* Fixed changelog for
Package updated upstream. And debian package too.
The respective dsc file can be found at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cronolog/cronolog_1.6.4-1.dsc
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:12:42AM +0100, xakz wrote:
> Both of you are right, I'm fixing that.
>
> Thank pointing me to this issue
Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:36:44 +0200
with message-id <20141027083644.ga2...@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#762680: RFS: wmanager/0.2.1-12 (refresh packaging)
has caused the Debian Bug report #762680,
regarding RFS: wmanager/0.2.1-12 (refresh packaging)
to be marked
Your message dated Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:02:52 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <20141027080252.c88d7100...@bombadil.mhp>
and subject line Package uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #764958,
regarding RFS: python-click/3.3-1 [ITP #764953]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Both of you are right, I'm fixing that.
Thank pointing me to this issues.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 08:42:00PM +0100, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Andreas Moog
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:43:12AM +0100, Maxime Chatelle wrote:
> >
>
> > Unless I'm missing
26 matches
Mail list logo
