Bug#765179: RFS: yubikey-neo-manager/0.2.2-1 [ITP] -- YubiKey NEO management graphical user interface

2014-10-13 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 21:35 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for our package "yubikey-neo-manager": Hello Simon! Thank you for your help in packaging the yubikey neo manager for Debian! I've got a few things that might need fixing up for you to take a

Bug#764261: RFS: librocket/1.3-1 [ITP]

2014-10-13 Thread whey bags
wait, nvm , think I read it wrong On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:23 PM, whey bags wrote: >> The .so symlink should be installed in the -dev package. > > From reading > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-runtime > , it seems like it should be in the runtime packag

Bug#764261: RFS: librocket/1.3-1 [ITP]

2014-10-13 Thread whey bags
> The .so symlink should be installed in the -dev package. >From reading >https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-runtime , it seems like it should be in the runtime package, as I have it? On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, 2014-10-06 at

Bug#765179: RFS: yubikey-neo-manager/0.2.2-1 [ITP] -- YubiKey NEO management graphical user interface

2014-10-13 Thread Simon Josefsson
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for our package "yubikey-neo-manager": * Package name: yubikey-neo-manager Version : 0.2.2-1 Upstream Author : Dain Nilsson * URL : https://developers.yubico.com/yubikey-neo-man

Re: Bug#764261: RFS: librocket/1.3-1 [ITP]

2014-10-13 Thread whey bags
I've made an account on alioth, called wheybags-guest, and requested access to the collab-maint project. I understand I need a sponsor to be added. Is this an appropriate place to ask for a sponsor? If so, would anyone sponsor me? On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > On 10/13/201

Bug#764261: RFS: librocket/1.3-1 [ITP]

2014-10-13 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
You will need to sign up for access to alioth and then request a Debian Developer sponsor your access. Check out https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/PackagingProject for more information. On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:59 PM, whey bags wrote: > How do I get access to the collab maint project? > > On Tue,

Re: Bug#764261: RFS: librocket/1.3-1 [ITP]

2014-10-13 Thread Ross Gammon
On 10/13/2014 08:59 PM, whey bags wrote: > How do I get access to the collab maint project? > https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/PackagingProject -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archiv

Bug#764261: RFS: librocket/1.3-1 [ITP]

2014-10-13 Thread whey bags
How do I get access to the collab maint project? On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote: > Hi Tom! > > Thanks for packaging librocket for Debian. I've got a couple things for > you to fix as the next steps. > > 1. You should delete all of those .ex files in the debian direct

Bug#764831: marked as done (RFS: geolinks/0.0.1-1 [ITP])

2014-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:24:49 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: geolinks/0.0.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #764831, regarding RFS: geolinks/0.0.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#730445: marked as done (RFS: plsense/0.3.1-1 [ITP])

2014-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:24:49 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: plsense/0.3.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #730445, regarding RFS: plsense/0.3.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#764949: marked as done (RFS: gdal/1.11.1+dfsg-1~exp1)

2014-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:24:51 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: gdal/1.11.1+dfsg-1~exp1 has caused the Debian Bug report #764949, regarding RFS: gdal/1.11.1+dfsg-1~exp1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#764832: marked as done (RFS: pycsw/1.10.0+dfsg-1 [ITP])

2014-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:24:48 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: pycsw/1.10.0+dfsg-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #764832, regarding RFS: pycsw/1.10.0+dfsg-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th