Bug#761687: RFS: abraca/0.8.0+dfsg-1 -- Simple and powerful graphical client for XMMS2

Hi Daniels, On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 21:07 +0100, Daniel Lintott wrote: > > On 15/09/14 20:49, Daniel Svensson wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Daniel Lintott > > wrote: > > > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On 15/09/14 20:13, Daniel Svensson wrote: > > >

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:22:10PM -0300, Eriberto wrote: > To put a package in Debian you must remove the debian/ directory from > upstream source code and generate a new tarball. So, you must start a > new Debian package. You can use some ideas from upstream, not clone > the code only. I see seve

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

Hello, Sorry, I thought it was better to reuse an existing package. I have rebuilt it from scratch: http://mentors.debian.net/package/lutris Here are the answers to your questions: 1. It does not use it anymore. 2. I have set it to 9, which seems to be the current level. 3. It isn't a game but a

Bug#758163: Subject: RFS: kcm-ufw/0.4.3-1 ITP

Hi Shawn, About your package, please: 1. Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to d/control. You can see an example here[1]. [1] http://sources.debian.net/src/yowsup/0.0~git20140314.938cf1-1/debian/contr

Bug#761482: RFS: argyll/1.6.3-1 [ITA]

Hi Bastien, On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:28:54 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Le 14 sept. 2014 16:21, "Stephen Kitt" a écrit : > > Upgrading argyll does reveal a real problem though... Given that you're > > shipping all the documentation in argyll-doc, and symlinking from the > other > > two packag

Bug#753487: marked as done (RFS: stda/1.3.1-2 -- new upstream release (package already in Debian))

Your message dated Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:36:39 -0300 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#753487: RFS: stda/1.3.1-1 -- new upstream release (package already in Debian) has caused the Debian Bug report #753487, regarding RFS: stda/1.3.1-2 -- new upstream release (package already in Debian) to

Bug#753487: RFS: stda/1.3.1-1 -- new upstream release (package already in Debian)

Perfect! Thanks a lot for your work (as packager and as upstream). Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-14 11:45 GMT-03:00 Dimitar Ivanov : > Hi Eriberto, > > may be my last message was not very clear or visually well-formated with the > statment that the pakcage can be downloaded also from mentors.d.n (i

Bug#757966: RFS: lutris/0.3.4-1 [ITP]

Hi Pierre, I checked your package and you are using/cloning the original upstream packaging. To put a package in Debian you must remove the debian/ directory from upstream source code and generate a new tarball. So, you must start a new Debian package. You can use some ideas from upstream, not cl

Bug#761687: RFS: abraca/0.8.0+dfsg-1 -- Simple and powerful graphical client for XMMS2

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Daniel Lintott wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 15/09/14 20:13, Daniel Svensson wrote: > > * Add me to Maintainers since old maintainer is M.I.A. > > Did the MIA Team actually orphan the package, as I can't find a WNPP bug > for abraca? > > I may be wrong, but I belie

Bug#761687: RFS: abraca/0.8.0+dfsg-1 -- Simple and powerful graphical client for XMMS2

On 15/09/14 20:49, Daniel Svensson wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Daniel Lintott > wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > On 15/09/14 20:13, Daniel Svensson wrote: > > * Add me to Maintainers since old maintainer is M.I.A. > > Did the MIA Team actu

Bug#761687: RFS: abraca/0.8.0+dfsg-1 -- Simple and powerful graphical client for XMMS2

Hi Daniel, On 15/09/14 20:13, Daniel Svensson wrote: > * Add me to Maintainers since old maintainer is M.I.A. Did the MIA Team actually orphan the package, as I can't find a WNPP bug for abraca? I may be wrong, but I believe unless the package is orphaned, it's not possible to become maintaine

Bug#761687: RFS: abraca/0.8.0+dfsg-1 -- Simple and powerful graphical client for XMMS2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "abraca". A friendly member of #debian-mentors, LocutusOfBorg1, took care of the M.I.A. reporting a while back after I've been trying to contact the old maintainer since mid July. * Packa

Bug#761482: RFS: argyll/1.6.3-1 [ITA]

Le 14 sept. 2014 16:21, "Stephen Kitt" a écrit : > > Hi Jörg, > > On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:29:18 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst > wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 14.09.2014, 12:35 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt: > > Line in d/changelog and comments in d/rules removed. > > I think that hardening=+all is not necess

Bug#761643: RFS: libstrophe/0.8.6-1 [ITP]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo pending Control: owner -1 ! Hi Dariusz, somehow the d/copyright is still not matching 100% to the code... At least for many files there is a "Copyright (c) 2005-2009 Collecta, Inc" which is not in d/copyright. So probably this copyright owner is missing for the * rule.

Bug#758538: Re: Bug#758538: RFS: pysdl2/0.9.3+dfsg1-1 [ITP] -- Python wrapper around SDL2 using ctypes

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:33:27AM +0200, fay...@web.de wrote: > > > This FTBFS on current sid: > > > > [...] > > Really? The svg backend of imagemagick broke now the third time in the last > > months. I will now remove the package from mentors and to it directly with > > rsvg-convert. I will po

Bug#747169: RFS: socksjs-twisted/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

Hi Alexandre, Sorry for my delay. I was traveling. 2014-09-11 18:09 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Rossi : > Thanks for your time. > - Please, create a VCS to control your debian/ versions. You can use github or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to d/control. You can see

Re: Bug#761564: cimg: FTBFS: fatal error: Magick++.h: No such file or directory

Le 15 sept. 2014 17:55, "Andreas Tille" a écrit : > > Hi David, > > I can confirm this problem. However, I have no idea why this happens. > The critical point is a makefile containing Newer imagemagick version does not supply this command. Please use pkg-config Bastien > > # Flags to enable nat

Re: Bug#761564: cimg: FTBFS: fatal error: Magick++.h: No such file or directory

Hi David, I can confirm this problem. However, I have no idea why this happens. The critical point is a makefile containing # Flags to enable native support of most classical image file formats, using the Magick++ library. # ( http://www.imagemagick.org/Magick++/ ) CIMG_MAGICK_CFLAGS = -Dcimg_

Bug#761645: RFS: filezilla/3.9.0.5-1 -- Full-featured graphical FTP/FTPS/SFTP client

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for filezilla 3.9.0.5-1. The package is maintained in collab-main/git: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/filezilla.git Changes since the last upload: filezilla (3.9.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=

Bug#761643: RFS: libstrophe/0.8.6-1 [ITP]

On 15. September 2014 12:30:51 MESZ, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: >Package: sponsorship-requests >Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libstrophe" - again. The > last version was rejected because of undocumented licensing. I fixed > these now, aft

Bug#760728: marked as done (RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.0-1~exp2)

Your message dated Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:46:35 +0200 with message-id and subject line RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.0-1~exp2 [uploaded] has caused the Debian Bug report #760728, regarding RFS: libgdal-grass/1.11.0-1~exp2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#761643: RFS: libstrophe/0.8.6-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libstrophe" - again. The last version was rejected because of undocumented licensing. I fixed these now, after claryfing things with FTP Masters. NOTE: the package links to OpenSS

Bug#761636: RFS: raceintospace/1.1+dfsg1-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "raceintospace" * Package name: raceintospace Version : 1.1+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : Michael K McCarty Pace Willisson Krzy

Bug#758538: Aw: Re: Bug#758538: RFS: pysdl2/0.9.3+dfsg1-1 [ITP] -- Python wrapper around SDL2 using ctypes

Hi, On 15/09/14 09:33, fay...@web.de wrote: > > Ok, new version is now uploaded. The new lintian warning looks like an error > in lintian and not like an error in the copyright file. At least in my > definition "Zlib or CC0" is not a standard license name but the concatenation > of two differe

Bug#758538: Aw: Re: Bug#758538: RFS: pysdl2/0.9.3+dfsg1-1 [ITP] -- Python wrapper around SDL2 using ctypes

> Gesendet: Montag, 15. September 2014 um 09:19 Uhr > Von: fay...@web.de > An: "Andrey Rahmatullin" > Cc: 758...@bugs.debian.org > Betreff: Aw: Re: Bug#758538: RFS: pysdl2/0.9.3+dfsg1-1 [ITP] -- Python > wrapper around SDL2 using ctypes > > > This FTBFS on current sid: > > [...] > Really? The

Re: How to resolve circular build dependency?

Le 14/09/2014 06:32, hero...@gentoo.org a écrit : > The concern of casacore{,-data} being out of sync might be resolved with > two tarballs supported by quilt 3.0 format[2]. I am not sure how to > implement it in a clean way by git-buildpackage. Any examples > available? Dear Benda, If you do t

Bug#758538: Aw: Re: Bug#758538: RFS: pysdl2/0.9.3+dfsg1-1 [ITP] -- Python wrapper around SDL2 using ctypes

> This FTBFS on current sid: > > convert -crop '592x460+60+198' examples/resources/testimage.svg > examples/resources/hello.bmp > convert: delegate failed `"rsvg-convert" -o "%o" "%i"' @ > error/delegate.c/InvokeDelegate/1153. > convert: unable to open image `/tmp/magick-7273141gzX9tbwj1': No su