On 04/09/14 07:01, FERNANDO CROWLEY wrote:
> looking for some direction where to start contributing newbie
> Thanks
>
https://www.debian.org/intro/help
sudo apt-get install how-can-i-help
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian
Hi Aurelien,
thanks for the hint. In case you can do this also for other
architectures + packages: seqan also needs a lot of resources.
When looking at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=seqan
and considering that for Jessie all erchitectures except of
hurd passed this means migh
tags 760257 - moreinfo
thanks
Hi Eriberto,
Thanks for checking about the queue; it would be great to upload now
since that won't cause any issues with respect to the queue.
On 04/09/14 04:16, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> I review your package. There are several Lintian messages
> 'executable-not-elf-o
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 09:11:07AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to
>
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=abinit&arch=mips&ver=7.8.2-1&stamp=1409394988
>
> abinit build fails in dh_auto_test. Any hint would be welcome.
>
IN fact, the build timeouts. It hap
looking for some direction where to start contributing newbie
Thanks
Hi Marc, how are you?
We need begin anew. So, I will analyse the packages from zero.
In a first moment, we will work over cbootimage-configs only. Please:
1. The g GIT commit was on 2014-08-06. So, the version must be
0.0+20140806~git18e531f (I prefer git instead 'g').
2. d/changelog: you need
Hi Carl,
I review your package. There are several Lintian messages
'executable-not-elf-or-script'. I will need that you fix it.
Please, confirm that you want the upload before the 1.0.4 version
arrives to unstable.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-09-02 0:54 GMT-03:00 Carl Suster :
> Package: sponsorshi
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> Hi! Thanks for your reply.
>
> 2014-09-03 2:23 GMT-03:00 Guo Yixuan :
> >
> >> 2. If you are a DM, why you don't upload the package?
> >
> > Because there's a new binary package, gccgo-doc, it needs
> > to go through new queue, so my upl
You may need to build it with export CLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/ivy.jar
in debian/rules
And I saw ivy tends to fetch some files from the net
2014-07-23 0:51 GMT+04:00 Hilko Bengen :
> * Raaj S:
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lucene"
>>
>> * Package name: lucene
>>Versio
Ok, two FTP-Master told me taht I can upload. From IRC now (Brazil, UTC-3):
[11:56] Hi. I have a package in NEW. Can I upload a package
with a new upstream version or I should avoid it? I think that is
better wait the package arrives to testing, but it was a question in a
talk with other DD. Than
Hi Eriberto,
>
>
> Sorry, but I need you review each file. As an example, Everaldo Canuto
> hasn't copyright over src/gui/osm-utils.h, src/gui/osm-gps-map-ais.c
> and src/gui/osm-gpsmap-ais.h. There is a other case. I didn't see the
> name Matti Aarnio in copyright. Use 'grep -sriA30 copyright *'
2014-09-03 5:36 GMT-03:00 Vincent Cheng :
>
> Why would you need to wait until the package gets accepted through NEW
> and migrates to testing before sponsoring a newer version of this
> package? Assuming the package is ready for upload, you can go ahead
> and upload it to NEW now without any negat
Hi! Thanks for your reply.
2014-09-03 2:23 GMT-03:00 Guo Yixuan :
>
>> 2. If you are a DM, why you don't upload the package?
>
> Because there's a new binary package, gccgo-doc, it needs
> to go through new queue, so my upload is not allowed by
> ftp masters.
Sure. I didn't see this new package b
2014-09-02 18:09 GMT-03:00 Ruben Undheim :
>>
>>> 3. I've gone through all Copyright-lines in all the files and I hope I
>>> have included all. However, after I put the licenses separately below,
>>> a few lintian information warnings appeared. I'm not sure what is best
>>> to do here.
>>
>> There
2014-09-03 12:59 GMT+01:00 Felix Salfelder :
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:15:13PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > I fail to understand what you mean. My problem is not with upstream.
> > Upstream
> > does provide all the necessary stuff to generate different versions of
> the
> > library for
>
Hi Julien,
2014-09-03 11:18 GMT+01:00 Julien Puydt :
> Hi,
>
> Le 03/09/2014 10:24, Ghislain Vaillant a écrit :
>
> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I am currently working on packaging 2 libraries (potentially a 3rd one
>> too)
>> which supports multi-precision arithmetic (single, double and long
>> double),
Hi,
I have a number of man pages like funopen.3:
-8<
[...]
..TH funopen 3 "January 2, 2008" "version 1.4.2" "SAORD Documentation"
[...]
..SH "NAME"
\&\fBFunOpen \- open a Funtools data file\fR
-8<
The name funopen.3
Hi Thibaut,
Thanks for the clarification to you, too.
I'm sorry I misread Ghislain's answer. I interpreted it in the specific
context of the commit I had referenced in my first message as an
example, which IMO introduces very little additional complexity -
although it may seem somewhat comple
Thanks for the clarification, Vincent!
Cheers,
Martin
El 03/09/14 a les 11:22, Vincent Cheng ha escrit:
Hi Martin,
No, there is no rule saying that a package cannot include anything
that's unnecessary for sid and/or would benefit downstream
distributions. There's nothing that compels maintai
Le 03/09/2014 11:05, Martin Steghöfer a écrit :
> El 29/08/14 a les 23:33, Ghislain Vaillant ha escrit:
>> Well, you are supposed to target what's in there in unstable if you
>> want your package to be accepted in the archive. Afterwards, Ubuntu
>> will automatically pick it up for its current deve
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Martin Steghöfer wrote:
> El 29/08/14 a les 23:33, Ghislain Vaillant ha escrit:
>
>> Well, you are supposed to target what's in there in unstable if you want
>> your package to be accepted in the archive. Afterwards, Ubuntu will
>> automatically pick it
Your message dated Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:57:13 +0100
with message-id <20140903085713.ga9...@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#759535: RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #759535,
regarding RFS: gmpc/11.8.16-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
El 29/08/14 a les 23:33, Ghislain Vaillant ha escrit:
Well, you are supposed to target what's in there in unstable if you
want your package to be accepted in the archive. Afterwards, Ubuntu
will automatically pick it up for its current development version
(14.10 or 15.04) depending on how fast
* Vincent Cheng , 2014-09-03, 01:36:
Carl, it doesn't particularly matter whether a package in NEW is at the
front, middle, or end of the queue, because ftpmasters don't review
every package in NEW in the order that it got into the queue; it's most
certainly not a FIFO queue.
Indeed!
https://
On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 at 09:32:26 +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
> I prepared an upload that makes it possible to build gmpc with a recent vala.
> If you're interested in sponsoring this fix, I filed a RFS as #759535.
I occasionally use gmpc, and the debdiff looks good, so I'll sponsor this
(assuming
Hi Stuart,
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 05:56:28PM +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> A while ago I looked at abinit 7.4.2 and 7.4.3 and found that it had lots of
> test failures on both amd64 and i386. Looking closely at those failures, I
> found that they were all differences at the 7
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> tags 760257 moreinfo
> thanks
>
>
> Hi Carl,
>
>
> 2014-09-02 0:54 GMT-03:00 Carl Suster :
>>
>> I'm not sure if it's best to wait until that is accepted before
>> attempting to upload this new release? If the package got bumped to the
>> end
Hi everyone,
I am currently working on packaging 2 libraries (potentially a 3rd one too)
which supports multi-precision arithmetic (single, double and long double),
similar to what FFTW does. So from the source package, one can build
different binary package corresponding to each precision. For ea
Il Mercoledì 3 Settembre 2014 8:24, Tobias Frost ha scritto:
>
>
>On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 11:01 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>
>> > Il Lunedì 1 Settembre 2014 15:42, Tobias Frost ha scritto:
>> > >> Hi Tobias
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi Gianfranco,
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes, collab-maint wou
Hi Andreas,
A while ago I looked at abinit 7.4.2 and 7.4.3 and found that it had lots of
test failures on both amd64 and i386. Looking closely at those failures, I
found that they were all differences at the 7th or 8th significant figure
between test output and a sample output that was prepared
Hi,
according to
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=abinit&arch=mips&ver=7.8.2-1&stamp=1409394988
abinit build fails in dh_auto_test. Any hint would be welcome.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.
31 matches
Mail list logo
