> Btw. I was wondering, how much we care about downstream distributions.
> This package, as it currently is in the "master" branch, compiles with
> Libav10 (i.e. it works with Debian jessie and Debian sid). Ubuntu 14.04
> currently has Libav9 and as I'm mainly working on Ubuntu, I've patched
> thin
Still looking for a sponsor...
Meanwhile I've made some minor improvements. The new version has been
uploaded to mentors and VCS:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/karlyriceditor
https://github.com/martin-steghoefer/debian-karlyriceditor
Btw. I was wondering, how much we care about downstream
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tkinfo"
* Package name: tkinfo
Version : 2.8-5
Upstream Author : Kennard White
* URL : http://math-www.uni-paderborn.de/~axel/tkinfo/
* License :
Hi,
Quoting Paul Wise (2014-08-29 17:47:10)
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Would this solve the license incompatibility between fuzzylite (apache 2.0)
> > and vcmi (gpl2+)?
>
> Yes because the latest version (5.0) of fuzzylite (LGPLv3) is
> compatible with vmci (GP
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Would this solve the license incompatibility between fuzzylite (apache 2.0)
> and
> vcmi (gpl2+)?
Yes because the latest version (5.0) of fuzzylite (LGPLv3) is
compatible with vmci (GPLv2+).
> I asked upstream whether they can remove th
Hi,
Quoting Paul Wise (2014-08-29 17:02:35)
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > the upstream of fuzzylite relicensed from apache 2.0 to LGPL 3.0 with the
> > release of fuzzylite 5.0 (but not the versions prior to that). So if
> > upstream should upgrade their copy of t
I thought about it too. This is the best option.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-08-29 12:02 GMT-03:00 Paul Wise :
>
> Please ask vmci upstream to remove the embedded copy of fuzzylite and
> depend on the system version.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> the upstream of fuzzylite relicensed from apache 2.0 to LGPL 3.0 with the
> release of fuzzylite 5.0 (but not the versions prior to that). So if upstream
> should upgrade their copy of the embedded fuzzylite, then the license problem
> sh
Your message dated Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:41:44 -0300
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#755410: RFS: python-xmp-toolkit/2.0.1-1 [ITA] --
Python library for XMP
has caused the Debian Bug report #755410,
regarding RFS: python-xmp-toolkit/2.0.1-1 [ITA] -- Python library for XMP
to be marked as
2014-08-29 11:31 GMT-03:00 Daniel Stender :
> Alright. I've checked out the latest revision which was pushed on the same
> day, it just completed CHANGELOG and AUTHORS:
> https://github.com/python-xmp-toolkit/python-xmp-toolkit/commit/5437b0ac5f756762ceba30bf97486d049727cd0b
Right. I made a mistak
On 29.08.2014 15:52, Eriberto wrote:
Further, I would like to package the latest git rev. as 2.0.1~git000-1,
do you agree?
Yes! But I think that the correct is 2.0.1~git20140309.984fb5. To see
more examples: $ dpkg -l | grep -i git.
Alright. I've checked out the latest revision which was
Yes! Thanks. We need wait now.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-08-29 10:52 GMT-03:00 Johannes Schauer :
> Hi,
>
> iyou dropped the ITP bug as a recipient - was that intended?
>
> In case it was I only quoted the small part below. I hope that's okay?
>
> Quoting Eriberto (2014-08-25 16:01:36)
>> 2014-08-2
Hi,
iyou dropped the ITP bug as a recipient - was that intended?
In case it was I only quoted the small part below. I hope that's okay?
Quoting Eriberto (2014-08-25 16:01:36)
> 2014-08-24 17:22 GMT-03:00 Johannes Schauer :
> > But vcmi itself is GPL-2+ and both resources agreed that Apache2 is
2014-08-29 9:58 GMT-03:00 Daniel Stender :
> Eriberto,
> thank you very much for reviewing my package.
Hi Daniel!
Thanks for all changes
> Further, I would like to package the latest git rev. as 2.0.1~git000-1,
> do you agree?
Yes! But I think that the correct is 2.0.1~git20140309.984fb5.
Your message dated Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:25:02 -0300
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#759479: RFS: profanity/0.4.4-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #759479,
regarding RFS: profanity/0.4.4-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages ufoai, ufoai-data, ufoai-maps
and ufoai-music.
* Package name: ufoai
Version : 2.5-1
Upstream Author : UFO:AI team
* URL : http://ufoai.org
* License : G
2014-08-29 10:11 GMT-03:00 Dariusz Dwornikowski
:
>>
>
> Sorry for that. Updated as you requested.. and new version in mentors.
No problems! You're always welcome. :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
On 29.08.14 08:24:24, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> 2014-08-29 5:46 GMT-03:00 Dariusz Dwornikowski
> :
> >> 2. d/copyight:
> >> - Put the license 'GPL-3+ with OpenSSL exception' only one time
> >> in your file. You can see an example here[2].
> >> - The files have this append (not in License.txt
Eriberto,
thank you very much for reviewing my package.
On 28.08.2014 21:49, Eriberto Mota wrote:
1. d/copyright says that upstream copyright years are 2008-2009.
However, the upstream changelog has newer dates. Please, update the
years.
The changelog spans up to 2.0.0 of 2013.
I've rechecke
On 08/29/2014 12:56 PM, Eriberto wrote:
> I would like to suggest you to add a GPG signature for your upstream
> code in next release. To see more details, '$ man uscan' (search for
> pgpsigurlmangle). To sign your tarball, you can use 'gpg -ab
> '.
I am already signing upstream tarballs since few
2014-08-29 5:46 GMT-03:00 Dariusz Dwornikowski
:
>> 2. d/copyight:
>> - Put the license 'GPL-3+ with OpenSSL exception' only one time
>> in your file. You can see an example here[2].
>> - The files have this append (not in License.txt):
>>
>> * You must obey the GNU General Public Licens
Your message dated Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:00:22 -0300
with message-id
and subject line Bug#759296: RFS: psensor/1.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #759296,
regarding RFS: psensor/1.0.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Very good! Thanks!
I would like to suggest you to add a GPG signature for your upstream
code in next release. To see more details, '$ man uscan' (search for
pgpsigurlmangle). To sign your tarball, you can use 'gpg -ab
'.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-08-29 5:49 GMT-03:00 jeanfi :
> Hello Eriberto,
>
>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:32:13AM +, T o n g wrote:
> Ok, just for problem-solving purpose, the source package is at
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/histring/histring_1.1.0-2.dsc
>
> This is a minimum-fixed version, ie, there are still lots of issues
> unfixed, but source pack
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libtorrent-rasterbar" on
wheezy-backports.
This is a straightforward rebuild of the current testing package.
The reason for wanting libtorrent-rasterbar 0.16.x
(libtorrent-rasterbar7, pyth
> Hi again Dariusz. Please:
>
> 1. d/control: reorganize your long description using topics. You can
> see an example here[1]. As suggestion to increase the chance of the
> users find your package, add the words 'Jabber', 'instant messenger
> (IM)' and 'network'.
I did my best there, fixed the de
Hello Eriberto,
Thanks for your review!
I have uploaded to mentors an updated version of the package fixing
the raised issues.
On 08/28/2014 04:55 PM, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> 1. d/control: I will leave you decide it. But, can you remove the
> isolated dot at end of each long description? I will a
Your message dated Fri, 29 Aug 2014 01:17:54 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#758978: RFS: libbinio/1.4+dfsg1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #758978,
regarding RFS: libbinio/1.4+dfsg1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
28 matches
Mail list logo
