Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2014 04:24:45 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: plsense/0.20-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #730445,
regarding RFS: plsense/0.20-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
I've been looking at the RFS process [1]. Some of this was in the
debian-mentors list about a year ago, albeit using corrupt data.
First the good news:
- About 1000 RFS submissions have led to accepted packages since January 2012
- The package acceptance rate has consistently been about 2/3
- Abo
Od: Tobias Frost
Hello Tobias,
thank you for reviewing!
"Ok, review complete.
When below things are fixed, I will upload it.
--
tobi
d/copyright:
(beside the already discussed things)
- Files-Excluded not needed
- Whats the copyright of the gpx examples?
- src/cursors not documented
d
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 06:58:15PM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
> 2014-08-17 17:27 GMT-03:00 Luis Henriques :
> > Hi Eriberto,
>
>
> Hi!!!
>
>
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 08:32:55PM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
> >> Hi Luis,
> >>
> >> Sorry for my delay and congratulations for your work. I agree with
> >>
Hi Philip,
In gimagereader, please:
1. Fix this Linitian message: desktop-entry-lacks-keywords-entry
2. Create a VCS to control your /debian versions. You can use github
or other. So, add the Vcs-Browser and Vcs-{Git|Svn|Cvs} to d/control.
3. d/control: please, in long description, put one or t
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 09:02 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Od: Sebastiaan Couwenberg
>
> I think the WTFPL short name should keep the version number,
> WTFPL-2 was
> better IMHO.
>
> The text of the QT license exception is still missing the LGPL
> e
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 14:11 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 08/18/2014 08:52 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Hi Sebastiaan,
> >
> > On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 23:57 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >> On 08/17/2014 10:55 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> >>> Regarding the patch: I'm not near a PC ri
Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:35:37 -0300
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: yadifa/1.0.3-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #683120,
regarding RFS: yadifa/1.0.3-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hi Eriberto,
thanks for looking at my package. I added a man page now and corrected the
capitalization error in description. I use hardening build flags but I don't
know
why no fortified libc functions are used - do you have an idea?
If you want to review my package you also need gtkspellmm[1] f
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pysdl2"
* Package name: pysdl2
Version : 0.9.3+dfsg1-1
Upstream Author : Marcus von Appen
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/marcusva/py-sdl2
* License :
Hi Eriberto,
Quoting Eriberto (2014-08-18 16:55:20)
> I saw your package in mentors.debian.org and it has several Lintian messages.
>
> IMHO, to get a sponsor you must, at least, clear your package removing
> all possible messages.
which Lintian messages are you referring to?
There is one pedan
tags 742309 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Navaneeth,
I saw your package in mentors.debian.org and it has several Lintian messages.
IMHO, to get a sponsor you must, at least, clear your package removing
all possible messages.
PS: to improve your Lintian, please, see http://bit.ly/lintian
Regards,
Eriber
tags 742077 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Johannes,
I saw your package in mentors.debian.org and it has several Lintian messages.
IMHO, to get a sponsor you must, at least, clear your package removing
all possible messages.
PS: to improve your Lintian, please, see http://bit.ly/lintian
Regards,
Eribert
tags 744823 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Ruben,
I saw your package in mentors.debian.org and it has some Lintian messages.
IMHO, to get a sponsor you must, at least, clear your package removing
all possible messages.
PS: to improve your Lintian, please, see http://bit.ly/lintian
Regards,
Eriberto
20
tags 748613 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Philip,
I saw your package in mentors.debian.org and it has some Lintian messages.
IMHO, to get a sponsor you must, at least, clear your package removing
all possible messages.
PS: to improve your Lintian, please, see http://bit.ly/lintian
Regards,
Eriberto
Your message dated Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:52:52 -0300
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#753893: RFS: rapid-photo-downloader/0.4.10-2 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #753893,
regarding RFS: rapid-photo-downloader/0.4.10-2 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gestioip"
* Package name: gestioip
Version : 3.0.26+dfsg0-1
Upstream Author : Marc Uebel
* URL : http://www.gestioip.net
* License : GPL-3+
Sect
Hi Eriberto,
Am Montag, den 18.08.2014, 08:53 -0300 schrieb Eriberto:
> 2014-08-18 2:14 GMT-03:00 Jörg Frings-Fürst
:
> > Hola Eriberto,
>
> Hi!
>
> >> Please, check all files, years, licenses and authors.
> > Done.
> > - Change years
> > - Remove file entrys of non-existing files
> > - Reord
On 08/18/2014 14:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> The license header in the artifact doesn't state the "or later", but
> refers to the license as published by the FSF which does include it:
[...]
> The full license text is not included in the header, but is deferred to
> the license as published
On 08/18/2014 08:52 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Sebastiaan,
>
> On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 23:57 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 08/17/2014 10:55 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
>>> Regarding the patch: I'm not near a PC right now, so can't check: Are you
>>> sure the license of those files with t
Hi Ole,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:07:31AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Andreas Tille writes:
> > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:31:40PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> >>
> >> And, the question remains: how do I effectively shall maintain such a
> >> package without burding a heavy load to my sponso
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Daniel Lintott wrote:
[...]
> My suggestion would be to contact upstream and see if they are prepared
> to make a source package available via the download mechanism.
>
Unfortunately that is not possible because of [1]. Are you sure there
is no way to get a list o
2014-08-18 2:14 GMT-03:00 Jörg Frings-Fürst :
> Hola Eriberto,
Hi!
>> Please, check all files, years, licenses and authors.
> Done.
> - Change years
> - Remove file entrys of non-existing files
> - Reorder sections
A very good work. However, the rapid/ValidatedEntry.py is using a MIT
license.
Hi Eugene,
On 18/08/14 12:39, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> [...]
>> My suggestion would be to contact upstream and see if they are prepared
>> to make a source package available via the download mechanism.
>>
> Unfortunately that is not possible
Forwarding to debian-mentors as I forgot to earlier.
Original Message
Subject: Re: RFS: java-comment-preprocessor/5.3.3
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:37:26 +0100
From: Daniel Lintott
To: Eugene Zhukov
CC: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Hi Eugene,
On 18/08/14 09:52, Eugene Zhukov w
Hello,
I packaged java-comment-preprocessor, which is a dependency for
Saxon-HE 9.5.1.1.
The ITP is 757093 (it also has a link to repo).
The package is otherwise ready to be uploaded to NEW, but I need help
with d/watch.
I sent email about it to debian-java [1], but no response.
[1] https://list
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:31:40PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>>
>> And, the question remains: how do I effectively shall maintain such a
>> package without burding a heavy load to my sponsor and possibly to other
>> people (porters)? I am willing to do my job here, but I
On 2014-08-18 09:46 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Ole,
>
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:31:40PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>>
>> And, the question remains: how do I effectively shall maintain such a
>> package without burding a heavy load to my sponsor and possibly to other
>> people (porters)?
On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 21:11 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Ok, review complete.
When below things are fixed, I will upload it.
--
tobi
d/copyright:
(beside the already discussed things)
- Files-Excluded not needed
- Whats the copyright of the gpx examples?
- src/cursors not documented
d/dir
Hi Ole,
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:31:40PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>
> And, the question remains: how do I effectively shall maintain such a
> package without burding a heavy load to my sponsor and possibly to other
> people (porters)? I am willing to do my job here, but I see myself quite
>
Od: Sebastiaan Couwenberg
"I think the WTFPL short name should keep the version number, WTFPL-2 was
better IMHO.
The text of the QT license exception is still missing the LGPL exception
text. I suggest at least the changes included in the attached patch.
Since the license text of the QT commerc
Hi Sebastiaan,
On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 23:57 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 08/17/2014 10:55 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Regarding the patch: I'm not near a PC right now, so can't check: Are you
> > sure the license of those files with the exception had a "or later" on
> > their GPL opt
32 matches
Mail list logo
