Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2014 04:24:36 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: pktools/2.5.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #758244,
regarding RFS: pktools/2.5.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "air-quality-sensor"
* Package name: air-quality-sensor
Version : 0.1.1-3
Upstream Author : Jan-Benedict Glaw
* URL : https://github.com/bwildenhain/air-qualit
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kcm-ufw"
* Package name: kcm-ufw
Version : 0.4.3-1
* Upstream Author : Craig Drummond
URL :
http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/UFW+KControl+Module?content=1377
Hi,
thanks for the hints which I forwarded upstream. While I've got no
explicit answer about this a new version was released which now even
fails to build on amd64 but with a different error. My guess is that
this is caused since upstream includes a code copy of an older version
of seqan-dev and
Jakub Wilk writes:
> [Out of curiosity, is there a reason your name in the From field is
> written in a mixture of Latin and Cyrillic scripts?]
That is my usenet-setup; it just makes it difficult do google my
postings by my name while the name is still human-readable.
> * Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr , 2014-08
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pktools"
Package name: pktools
Version : 2.5.3-1
Upstream Author : Pieter Kempeneers
URL : http://www.nongnu.org/pktools/html/index.html
License : GPL-3.0
Jakub Wilk writes:
> * Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr , 2014-08-14, 19:49:
>>> i386 packages can be built in a chroot. For anything else, you can
>>> ask on a porters' mailing list[0]; although it might not be worth
>>> the effort.
>>
>> Since I am not a DD yet, this would mean that I have to ask for
>> access to
On 2014-08-15 17:50 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> The warning seems to be red herring, maybe the tool scanning the build
> logs needs to be adapted for dpkg-dev 1.17.11 which changed the default
> CFLAGS, replacing -fstack-protector with -fstack-protector-strong.
For the record, that would be bug
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr , 2014-08-14, 19:49:
i386 packages can be built in a chroot. For anything else, you can ask
on a porters' mailing list[0]; although it might not be worth the
effort.
Since I am not a DD yet, this would mean that I have to ask for access
to all porter boxes, build the binaries,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kvmcs":
* Package name : kvmcs
Version : 0.4.4-2
Upstream author : willem kuyn; willemk...@gmail.com
* URL : https://gitorious.org/kvmcs/kvmc
On 2014-08-15 16:11 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> I maintain linuxinfo and now I get an "issue"[1] that the hardening
> flags appear to be missing.
>
> In the build logs I see some, and I expected my debian/rules to pick
> everything up (since I use dh):
> #!/usr/bin/make -f
>
> %:
> dh
[Out of curiosity, is there a reason your name in the From field is
written in a mixture of Latin and Cyrillic scripts?]
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr , 2014-08-15, 10:15:
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local
Hello,
I maintain linuxinfo and now I get an "issue"[1] that the hardening
flags appear to be missing.
In the build logs I see some, and I expected my debian/rules to pick
everything up (since I use dh):
#!/usr/bin/make -f
%:
dh $@ --with autotools_dev
I'm a bit lost now. Where could I
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
> One more question:
> Jakub Wilk writes:
> > * Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr , 2014-08-14, 09:46:
> >> I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
> >> (pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local pbuilder
> >> (after adding
One more question:
Jakub Wilk writes:
> * Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr , 2014-08-14, 09:46:
>> I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
>> (pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local pbuilder
>> (after adding non-free), it fails to build on the buildds [2].
>
>
Hi all,
I've got a personal mail from Gurkan, stating that he has no time to
continue with the package and asking me whether I could do it.
While I could prepare the package so that it can be uploaded (insert in
debian-astro's git, update to the newest version etc.), I don't want to
maintain it m
16 matches
Mail list logo
