I've just created a repo on pkg-gnustep. You can find it here:
git+ssh://your_alioth_usern...@scm.alioth.debian.org//git/pkg-gnustep/pkg-gmastermind.app.git
I've also added corresponding Vcs-Git: and Vcs-Browser: fields in d/control.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debi
Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:54:19 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#757616: RFS[RC/experimental]: imagemagick/8:6.8.9.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #757616,
regarding RFS[RC/experimental]: imagemagick/8:6.8.9.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Oops, forgot to add following info to the RFS template :
- uploaded package built with up-to-date pbuilder
- successfully compiled with clang (by hand, `CC=clang debuild` is not
compiling with clang)
- separately built for wheezy (with tcl-8.5) and now running fine a real
eggdrop bot
--
To
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eggdrop"
* Package name: eggdrop
Version : 1.6.21-4
Upstream Author : EggHeads Development Team
* URL : http://www.eggheads.org/
* License : GPL-2
Hi Eriberto,
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 05:19:31PM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> tags 757176 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi Luis Henriques,
>
> Please:
>
First of all, thank you a lot for your review. I've already gone through
all your comments and I've uploaded a new xombrero package into
mentors.debi
Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:27:58 +0200
with message-id <1407788878.3969.2.ca...@edoras.loewenhoehle.ip>
and subject line Re: Bug#757849: RFS: subsurface/4.0.3-2.1 [RC, NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #757849,
regarding RFS: subsurface/4.0.3-2.1 [RC, NMU]
to be marked as done.
Thi
Uploaded to mentors
Le 11 août 2014 12:09, "Vincent Fourmond" a écrit :
>
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES
> wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "imagemagick". It fix a RC
> > bug on the experimental version and thus is needed for imagemagick
> > transition.
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:29:16PM +0200, Benedict Verhegghe wrote:
> I created new packages pyformex/0.9.1-1 dealing with the remarks of
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750592#47
The package FTBFS:
=== Building extra ===
make -C /home/wrar/tmp/pyformex-0.9.1/pyformex/extra
mak
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "subsurface". Subsurface no longer
requires osmgpsmap as a dependency, and this is currently preventing osmgpsmap
from migrating to testing. The Release Team has been contacted and state that
Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:24:48 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tintii/2.9.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #755842,
regarding RFS: tintii/2.9.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:52:38 +0200
with message-id <53e8caa6.6070...@struktur.de>
and subject line Bug#740626: fixed in libde265 0.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #740626,
regarding RFS: libde265/0.6-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Hi folks,
WHile I'm waiting for my package to find a sponsor I'd like to start
working on bugs for the Games Team. I see bugs marked as "Unclassified"
but can't find out what this actually means. What makes a bug mark as
unclassified? Is it the lack of tags?
--
Steven Hamilton
I don't look like
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "imagemagick". It fix a RC
> bug on the experimental version and thus is needed for imagemagick
> transition.
I will handle that upload.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:19:46 +0200
with message-id <1407745186.17840.1.ca...@edoras.loewenhoehle.ip>
and subject line Re: Bug#757669: RFS: libstrophe/0.8.6-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #757669,
regarding RFS: libstrophe/0.8.6-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means tha
>
> This Pre-Depends is necessary due for the multi-arch support. See
> https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation
>
> Ok, just a last nitpick I missed earlier.
> your debian/*.dirs are not needed (refer to
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dother.en.html#dirs
> I think you
15 matches
Mail list logo
