Hi Vincent,
On Sun, 03 Aug 2014, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> > Took a bit longer than expected but v1.3.41 has been released; update
> > the title for the RFS bug with the new version.
>
> I can't seem to find 1.3.41 on mentors.d.n, only version 1.3.40. The
> debdiff looks sane enough however, so
Hi,
I tried to upload viewnior to ftp-eu but it seems unoperable. Then I
tried to upload to master, and have a problem. Since this is -2 point
release, ftp already knows the orig source tarball but it has
different size and checksum from .dsc. Probably someday was uploaded
partially. I cannot dele
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> tags 756634 moreinfo
> thanks
>
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> Please:
>
> 1. Update DH from 7 to 9.
>
> 2. Your package doesn't builds twice. To fix it:
>
> - As upstream, remove all po/*.mo when running make clean (or similar).
> - Idem for these di
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi Eric,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Eric Shattow wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Eriberto Mota
> wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> If it is an ITP, the package no exist in Debian yet. So, you musn't report
>> revisions. Please, remove all entries about the -2
On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 23:07 -0300, Eriberto wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am confuse... Is ok to revision and upload the current package in mentors?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eriberto
>
>
Sure, you can always upload to mentors. You don't even have to delete it
from mentors beforehand.
(Just make sure to keep the
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi Rémi,
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Rémi Verchère wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 03/07/2014 15:46, Geoff a écrit :
>> Since glances need python3-psutil (>= 2.0.0), you should precise it as well
>> in
>> the override file:
>>
>> psutil python3-psutil (>= 2.0.0)
>
> Ok, c
Hi Robert,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:29 AM, RJ Clay wrote:
> retitle 752690 RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.41-1 [RC] -- financial accounting and ERP
> program
> thanks
>
> On 07/05/2014 11:45 AM, RJ Clay wrote:
>
>
> Two release candidates (1 & 2) have been made available for LedgerSMB
> v1.3.41, and the fi
Your message dated Sun, 3 Aug 2014 20:33:35 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#755569: RFS: gnome-pie/0.5.5-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #755569,
regarding RFS: gnome-pie/0.5.5-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Hi Eriberto,
> Perhaps you can be interested in 'updates'. See here:
> https://wiki.debian.org/StableUpdates.
>
> But I think that your package can be kept in a conventional stable
> version. There is Debian-Backports[1] too. I use it.
I'll take a look.
> Your package is good for me now. Can I
Your message dated Sun, 3 Aug 2014 20:05:14 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#756452: RFS: libcap2/2.24-4 [ITA] -- POSIX 1003.1e
capabilities
has caused the Debian Bug report #756452,
regarding RFS: libcap2/2.24-4 [ITA] -- POSIX 1003.1e capabilities
to be marked as done.
This means
2014-08-03 23:40 GMT-03:00 Carl Suster :
> Hi Eriberto,
Hi!
> Thanks very much for your review. I've uploaded a new version to mentors
> which I believe addresses all of your feedback.
Thanks!
> There are two remaining lintian complaints that I'm not sure how to
> manage. The first is the mis
Your message dated Sun, 3 Aug 2014 19:50:06 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#756451: RFS: libcgroup/0.41 [ITA] -- control and
monitor control groups
has caused the Debian Bug report #756451,
regarding RFS: libcgroup/0.41 [ITA] -- control and monitor control groups
to be marked as d
Hi Eriberto,
Thanks very much for your review. I've uploaded a new version to mentors
which I believe addresses all of your feedback.
There are two remaining lintian complaints that I'm not sure how to
manage. The first is the missing d/watch file. A release is made solely
by adding a new tag to
Hi!
I am confuse... Is ok to revision and upload the current package in mentors?
Thanks!
Eriberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJeXKechW
Hi Jörg,
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on ipmitool exist a bug[1] to add "Dell 13G server" support.
>
> Therefore my questions:
>
> - Does Debian have rules when backports are possible?
> - What is your opinion about this backport?
>
Sven answered your qu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spatialite-tools"
Package name: spatialite-tools
Version : 4.2.0-1~exp1
Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri
URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/spatialite-tools/
Your message dated Sun, 3 Aug 2014 19:36:23 -0300
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#750677: RFS: buildnotify/0.3.5-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #750677,
regarding RFS: buildnotify/0.3.5-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
2014-08-03 18:59 GMT-03:00 Daniel Lintott :
> Hi Eriberto,
>
> Thanks for reviewing the package.
You're welcome.
> I haven't added any Gnome, KDE etc keywords, as the applet is designed
> to work independent of the desktop manager, but I'm welcome to further
> suggestions.
I still thinking that
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spatialite"
Package name: spatialite
Version : 4.2.0-1~exp1
Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri
URL : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libspatialite
License
Hi Eriberto,
Thanks for reviewing the package.
On 03/08/14 03:36, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Please:
>
> 1. d/buildinotify.desktop.example has
> 'Name[en_GB]=buildnotify.desktop.example' and 'Name=buildnotify'. Is
> right it? (I think that must be 'Name=buildnotify.desktop.example')
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 07:19:46PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
Hi,
> on ipmitool exist a bug[1] to add "Dell 13G server" support.
>
> Therefore my questions:
>
> - Does Debian have rules when backports are possible?
http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/#index5h3
Two answer your question
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "liblas"
Package name: liblas
Version : 1.8.0-1~exp1
Upstream Author : libLAS developers
URL : http://liblas.org/
License : BSD-3-Clause
Section :
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Yavor,
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:50:16 +0300 Yavor Doganov wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gorm.app".
I have several (in random order) remarks:
I find the man page rather short, is it reasonable to improve it?
I didn't check ye
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Yavor,
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:19:24 +0300 Yavor Doganov wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aclock.app".
I have several (in random order) remarks:
Are there any sources for the png/wav in Resources ?
The man page is rather brief
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Yavor,
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 10:45:38 +0300 Yavor Doganov wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gridlock.app".
I have several (in random order) remarks:
Please acknowledge nmus (even if the content is nearly all yours)
Are the d/dir
tags 756100 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Carl,
In d/copyright you should list all names shown in source code. I found
these extra notices:
src/modules/euroshare_eu.sh:# Copyright (c) 2011 halfman
src/modules/dataport_cz.sh:# Copyright (c) 2011 halfman
src/modules/oboom.sh: * Version 2.2 Copyright P
Hello,
on ipmitool exist a bug[1] to add "Dell 13G server" support.
Therefore my questions:
- Does Debian have rules when backports are possible?
- What is your opinion about this backport?
Thanks for your answers.
CU
Jörg
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756555
--
p
Your message dated Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:24:42 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: thunar-shares-plugin/0.2.0-7 [ITP] -- samba
usershare support for thunar filemanager (XFCE)
has caused the Debian Bug report #741662,
regarding RFS: thunar-shares-plugin/0.2.0-7 [ITP] -- samba usersha
On 2014-08-03 12:11, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> debian/copyright:
>> - src/pam/pam_cgroup.c is dual-licensed BSD and LGPL 2.1, not BSD or
>> GPL 2. That also makes the GPL-2 license block in d/copyright
>> obsolete.
>
> Hm... while you're right that something is off, the way I read it, it's
> mos
retitle 756100 RFS: plowshare4/1.0.4-1 [ITP] -- command-line application
to download files for file-sharing websites.
thanks
Dear mentors,
I've cleaned up the changelog and fixed the version number as well as a
few other files in debian/ after more carefully reading the
documentation. Any feedba
Hi Vincent,
thanks for another review.
On 2014-08-03 03:28, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for a new version of package libcap2
>> The package builds lintian-clean with sbuild. The source package can be
>> found here:
>>
>> http://www.kvr.at/debian/pool/main/libc/libcap2/
Hi Vincent,
thanks for the review.
On 2014-08-03 03:10, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for a new version of package libcgroup.
>> The package builds lintian-clean with sbuild. The source package can be
>> found here:
>>
>> http://www.kvr.at/debian/pool/main/libc/libcgroup
32 matches
Mail list logo
