Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-pie"
Package name: gnome-pie
Version : 0.5.5-1
Upstream Author : Simon Schneegans
URL : http://gnome-pie.simonschneegans.de/
License :
I have just submitted the issue as bug# 314771.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Guido van Steen
wrote:
> Hi Thibaut,
>
> } this is not what I mean: I don't like the "comments" feature of debexpo,
> } my opinion is that comments on a to-be-sponsored package should be sent
> } to the corresponding
Hi Thibaut,
} this is not what I mean: I don't like the "comments" feature of debexpo,
} my opinion is that comments on a to-be-sponsored package should be sent
} to the corresponding RFS bug.
Sorry for my misunderstanding. Yes, comments could indeed be
"referred" to the RFS/ITP bug. Debexpo coul
Le 21/07/2014 10:37, Guido van Steen a écrit :
> } IMHO, the right place for discussing a particular package is it's ITP
> } bug (when the package is prospective) or the RFS bug.
>
> AFAIAA there is no ITP or RFS for the package debexpo (the software at
> issue, which is running at mentors.debian.
} IMHO, the right place for discussing a particular package is it's ITP
} bug (when the package is prospective) or the RFS bug.
AFAIAA there is no ITP or RFS for the package debexpo (the software at
issue, which is running at mentors.debian.net).
Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentor
Le 19/07/2014 17:00, Guido van Steen a écrit :
> I agree with Joris.
>
> Users are not properly informed that discussions on mentors.debian.net
> may be automatically lost after a package is removed from
> mentors.debian.net. This should be changed. I would rather see the
> information backed-up i
6 matches
Mail list logo
