Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aclock.app".
It builds these binary packages:
aclock.app - Analog dockapp clock for GNUstep
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mento
On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 16:57 +0100, Dale Mellor wrote:
> > >On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Dale Mellor
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > Dear mentors,
> > >
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mcron"
> > >
> > > Package n
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jun 2014 04:23:41 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: shc/3.8.9-1 [ITP] -- Generic shell script compiler
has caused the Debian Bug report #735953,
regarding RFS: shc/3.8.9-1 [ITP] -- Generic shell script compiler
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "crunch"
* Package name: crunch
Version : 3.6-1
Upstream Author : Jason
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/crunch-wordlist/
* License : GPL-2.0
Sec
* Adam Borowski , 2014-06-13, 19:35:
Don't be afraid! :-) Fixing most portability doesn't require deep
knowledge about the architecture. It's often enough to be aware about
the basic differences between them, like endianness, bitness, or
whether unaligned access is permissible
And in this cas
Dear Debian Mentors and Debian Lispers,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.5-1
of my package "cl-launch".
It builds these binary packages:
cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell
The package appears to be lintian clean (except that I'm using
an ol
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 07:11:05PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Don't be afraid! :-) Fixing most portability doesn't require deep
> knowledge about the architecture. It's often enough to be aware
> about the basic differences between them, like endianness, bitness,
> or whether unaligned access is pe
I posted gory technical details directly to the bug. This mail will be
only about general porting advices:
* Andreas Tille , 2014-06-13, 12:06:
I think to solve this the help of porters is needed since the build log
does not say much.
I don't think many porters read debian-mentors@ldo. A bett
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:23:51 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: cppman/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- C++ 98/11 manual pages
for Linux, with source from cplusplus.com
has caused the Debian Bug report #734726,
regarding RFS: cppman/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- C++ 98/11 manual pages for Lin
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "steptalk".
It builds these binary packages:
steptalk - GNUstep Scripting Framework
libsteptalk-dev - GNUstep Scripting Framework (development files)
libsteptalk0 - GNUstep Scripting Frame
Hi there,
I'm currently maintaining signing-party, and I have some questions
regarding the upgrade of debian/copyright to version 1.0. (I attach the
original file, and my attempt to upgrade it.)
signing-party being a collection of scripts, it has a lot of authors,
I'm unsure how detailed the co
tags 751277 help
thanks
I think to solve this the help of porters is needed since the build log
does not say much. Otherwise the only reasonable thing to do from my
side would be to exclude the package from the architectures in question
since it seems to be possible that the package will not run
Dear Mentors,
libquazip is packaged for Debian in it's 0.5.x version. A new version
0.6.2 is available. I'm the packager of Debian libquazip (Debian Med
Team), Sergey (in cc) is the upstream manager of libquazip.
As I'm updating the package, I try to manage all registered bugs. One of
them is dir
13 matches
Mail list logo
