Bug#750771: your mail

On 2014-06-09 01:10:40, Jakub Wilk wrote: > >Hard to say atm as I've compared python-fysom_1.0.15.orig.tar.gz > >produced by dpkg and upstream provided tarball for > >fysom-1.0.15.tar.gz and internally (files and dirs) looks the > >same. But it's interesting so I try to figure it out. > > Huh, ori

Bug#750771: your mail

* Marcin Kulisz , 2014-06-08, 22:50: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-fysom/python-fysom_1.0.15-1.dsc Your .orig.tar is not the same as the tarball provided by upstream. Why? Hard to say atm as I've compared python-fysom_1.0.15.orig.tar.gz produced by dpkg and upstream pr

Bug#750771: your mail

On 2014-06-08 10:03:20, Jakub Wilk wrote: > [I don't intend to sponsor this package. Sorry!] HI Jakub, Thx for the review anyway :-) > * Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) , 2014-06-06, 18:33: > >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-fysom/python-fysom_1.0.15-1.dsc > > Your .orig.tar is not the

Bug#750898: marked as done (RFS: osmosis/0.43.1-1 [RC])

Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2014 16:23:25 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: osmosis/0.43.1-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #750898, regarding RFS: osmosis/0.43.1-1 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#750898: RFS: osmosis/0.43.1-1 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osmosis" Package name: osmosis Version : 0.43.1-1 Upstream Author : Brett Henderson URL : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmosis License : public-d

Bug#750771: RFS: python-fysom/1.0.15-1 [ITP] (bootstrap-vz dependency)

[I don't intend to sponsor this package. Sorry!] * Marcin Kulisz (kuLa) , 2014-06-06, 18:33: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-fysom/python-fysom_1.0.15-1.dsc Your .orig.tar is not the same as the tarball provided by upstream. Why? Upstream README says that the software come