Debug packages

2014-05-19 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, there's one thing that I thing that I have not understood quiet well in the packaging procedure: the debug packages (-dbg) For example, I'm packaging a library (ompl) and I have provided a debug version-. I have added in rules: override_dh_strip: dh_strip --dbg-package=libompl9-dbg

Bug#748591: RFS: gtkspellmm/3.0.3+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2014-05-19 Thread Vincent Cheng
Hi Philip, On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Philip Rinn wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtkspellmm". This package is a > dependency of gimagereader, a GTK front-end for tesseract-ocr, which I also > pa

Bug#748674: RFS: ipmitool/1.8.14-1 ITA

2014-05-19 Thread Vincent Cheng
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ipmitool" > > * Package name: ipmitool >Version : 1.8.14-1 >Upstream Au

Bug#748687: marked as done (RFS: dmidecode/2.12-3 ITA)

2014-05-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 May 2014 15:34:37 -0700 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#748687: RFS: dmidecode/2.12-3 ITA has caused the Debian Bug report #748687, regarding RFS: dmidecode/2.12-3 ITA to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#748476: marked as done (RFS: eggdrop/1.6.21-2)

2014-05-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 May 2014 15:23:39 -0700 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#748476: RFS: eggdrop/1.6.21-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #748476, regarding RFS: eggdrop/1.6.21-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#748476: RFS: eggdrop/1.6.21-2

2014-05-19 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Andrew Shadura wrote: > Hello, > > On 19 May 2014 05:03, Vincent Cheng wrote: >> - Why does debian/control now have "Build-Conflicts: autoconf2.13, >> automake1.4"? > > Probably because configure.in is for a newer autoconf, but doesn't > have AC_PREREQ(), so the

Bug#748476: RFS: eggdrop/1.6.21-2

2014-05-19 Thread Cédric Barboiron
On Sun, 18 May 2014 20:03:41 -0700 Vincent Cheng wrote: > > > Well, since I've read /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz > > and tried to use dh-autoreconf properly. You can find the updated > > package at the same place : > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eggdrop/eggd

Bug#748687: RFS: dmidecode/2.12-3 ITA

2014-05-19 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmidecode" * Package name: dmidecode Version : 2.12-3 Upstream Author : * URL : http://dmidecode.nongnu.org/ * License : GPL-2+ Section

Re: What do you do when your sid development system stops working?

2014-05-19 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
On 05/12/2014 04:33 AM, Paul Elliott wrote: I like to do my packaging under sid, because that is where the packages will first have to run, so I can test them there. But what do you do when your sid system stop work after doing an apt-get dist-upgrade? X11 stopped working no screens found. Of c

Bug#748674: RFS: ipmitool/1.8.14-1 ITA

2014-05-19 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ipmitool" * Package name: ipmitool Version : 1.8.14-1 Upstream Author : ipmitool-devel * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/ipmit

Bug#748476: RFS: eggdrop/1.6.21-2

2014-05-19 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On 19 May 2014 05:03, Vincent Cheng wrote: > - Why does debian/control now have "Build-Conflicts: autoconf2.13, > automake1.4"? Probably because configure.in is for a newer autoconf, but doesn't have AC_PREREQ(), so the autoconf wrapper incorrectly detects it as autoconf2.13-compatible b