On 2014-04-25 07:58, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
>> On 24.04.14 10:23:23, Christian Kastner wrote:
> I have got another problem. Libstrophe only provides .a file, no .so,
> so basically it should provide only a -dev package. Is it ok to
> package only -dev, or is it agains policies?
Not that I'm a
>On 24.04.14 10:23:23, Christian Kastner wrote:
>
> It is sufficient to change these to eg:
>
>usr/lib/*/lib*.a
Thanks for this.
I have got another problem. Libstrophe only provides .a file, no .so,
so basically it should provide only a -dev package. Is it ok to
package only -dev, or is it
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ipad-charge"
* Package name: ipad-charge
Version : 0~20131118.c82b032-1
Upstream Author : Max Korenkov
* URL : https://github.com/mkorenkov/ipad_charge
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Paul Gevers wrote:
> The one argument that I can come up with is that adding a package also
> adds about 1kB to the data that everybody in Debian has to download
> (on every update), also the people that are not interested in the
> package (which may be many).
It also increase
Hi Ole,
your debian/copyright needs some additions:
install/unix/systems/Cygwin/values.h is LGPL
gui/GraphLib/libsrc/uimxR5/include/msg.h is some Apple license
libsrc/readline/* is GPL1+
gui/GraphLib/DESCRIPTION has some additional license information
Most important
install/unix/systems/Li
Hi all,
In the last couple of days, the following came up multiple times.
Splitting binary packages adds to the total amount of packages in
Debian. I have heard that (some) people are very careful before they
decide to do that. What is the argument? I can come up with one, but I
wonder if there is
Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2014 16:23:37 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: notion/3+2014010901-1 -- tiling tabbed window
manager designed for keyboard users
has caused the Debian Bug report #734308,
regarding RFS: notion/3+2014010901-1 -- tiling tabbed window manager designe
Hi mentors,
Following feedback I have fixed some issues with the source package and
re-uploaded it with a -1 suffix. It can downloaded with dget using this
command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-ebooklib/python-ebooklib_0.15-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) writes:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for libzhuyin:
>
> * Package name: libzhuyin
> Version : 0.9.93
> Upstream Author : Peng Wu
> * URL : https://github.com/libzhuyin/libzhuyin
>
On 24/04/14 12:32, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> thanks for your continuous trials to help me. :-)
>
No problem! I enjoy a good bit of problem solving!
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:22:22AM +0100, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>>
>> Hope that helps...
>
> Not really since I can not confirm that
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hi All,
I am looking for a sponsor for libzhuyin:
* Package name: libzhuyin
Version : 0.9.93
Upstream Author : Peng Wu
* URL : https://github.com/libzhuyin/libzhuyin
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C++
D
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:14:08PM +1000, Benjamin Donald-Wilson wrote:
>Thanks for the advice. Just one more quick question, should I use date of
>the commit I'm using or the date that I package it? (last commit was
>roughly 5 months ago)
Their commit date. The reason is there is at le
Hi Daniel,
thanks for your continuous trials to help me. :-)
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:22:22AM +0100, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> On 24/04/14 10:32, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> > On 24/04/14 09:44, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> >> On 24/04/14 09:04, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> if you look at th
Thanks for the advice. Just one more quick question, should I use date of
the commit I'm using or the date that I package it? (last commit was
roughly 5 months ago)
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2014 1:00 PM, "Benjamin Donald-Wilson"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Th
On Apr 24, 2014 1:00 PM, "Benjamin Donald-Wilson" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> If that doesn't work, another possibility would be to create a mock
>> version number based on the date, for example
MMDD.{7-digit-commit-ID}.
>>
> So I will most likely
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Christian Kastner wrote:
> If that doesn't work, another possibility would be to create a mock
> version number based on the date, for example MMDD.{7-digit-commit-ID}.
...and possibly prepending it with 0~ in order to avoid you to
introduce an epoch in the f
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2014-04-24 12:45, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> > On 24.04.14 20:12:12, Benjamin Donald-Wilson wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm wishing to package ipad-charge[0] for Debian.[1] The only problem I
> >> appear to be having is that the u
On 2014-04-24 12:45, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> On 24.04.14 20:12:12, Benjamin Donald-Wilson wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm wishing to package ipad-charge[0] for Debian.[1] The only problem I
>> appear to be having is that the upstream don't version their uploads. I've
>> emailed the developer a few
On 24.04.14 20:12:12, Benjamin Donald-Wilson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm wishing to package ipad-charge[0] for Debian.[1] The only problem I
> appear to be having is that the upstream don't version their uploads. I've
> emailed the developer a few days ago but haven't received a response so far.
> I'm
Hello,
I'm wishing to package ipad-charge[0] for Debian.[1] The only problem I
appear to be having is that the upstream don't version their uploads. I've
emailed the developer a few days ago but haven't received a response so far.
I'm wondering what I should version it as if I do not receive a rep
On 24/04/14 10:32, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> On 24/04/14 09:44, Daniel Lintott wrote:
>> On 24/04/14 09:04, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> if you look at the HTML code of
>>>
>>>http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/download/
>>>
>>> you see strings like:
>>>
>>> \"mkgmap-r3226-src.tar.gz\": 1555754
On 24/04/14 09:44, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> On 24/04/14 09:04, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> if you look at the HTML code of
>>
>>http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/download/
>>
>> you see strings like:
>>
>> \"mkgmap-r3226-src.tar.gz\": 1555754, \"mkgmap-r3226-src.zip\": 2194070,
>>
>> and thus u
On 24/04/14 09:04, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if you look at the HTML code of
>
>http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/download/
>
> you see strings like:
>
> \"mkgmap-r3226-src.tar.gz\": 1555754, \"mkgmap-r3226-src.zip\": 2194070,
>
> and thus uscan stopped working. I guess it will be hard to
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Any idea how we could make uscan capable to detect and download the latest
> source anyway?
Use a match based on the zip download and downloadurlmangle to
transform that to a src tarball.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-
On 2014-04-24 08:16, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> dh_install: libstrophe-dev missing files (usr/lib/lib*.a), aborting
>
> The libstrophe.a file is installed into /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu,
> instead of /usr/lib. When should the .a file be installed into
> /usr/lib and when into x86... ?
The new
Hi,
if you look at the HTML code of
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/download/
you see strings like:
\"mkgmap-r3226-src.tar.gz\": 1555754, \"mkgmap-r3226-src.zip\": 2194070,
and thus uscan stopped working. I guess it will be hard to convince
upstream that their new shiny page is a bad idea for
26 matches
Mail list logo
