On 2014-03-31 12:37, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On 3/20/14, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> debian/control:
>> ==
>>
>> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), not debhelper (>= 9.0.0). IIRC there
>> exists a (written or unwritten) rule for when one can/should truncate
>> version numbers, but I can'
Everything that is interesting in the current netcdf-bin is included
in the C-library of netCDF. The only binaries included in the C++ and
Fortran builds are configuration assistants that are losing their
significance in the new CMake builds anyways.
Hence, I'd say it's reasonable to make netcdfc-b
On 3/20/14, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-03-13 05:57, Robert Ransom wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libb2":
>
> I'm not a DD so I can't sponsor your package, but here is a quick review:
>
>
> Building
>
>
> There is one troublesome aspect of the upstream
Hi Vincent,
On 31.03.2014 11:37, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Have you tried contacting the Debian Multimedia team [1] yet? You may
> have better luck at having your package reviewed and finding a sponsor
> within teams that package similar software and share similar
> interests. Good luck!
thanks, I j
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "libde265" which I have
just updated to the latest version 0.6-1.
It would be really great to find someone helping me get this into
Debian!
* Package name: libde265
Version
Hi Joachim,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "libde265" which I have
> just updated to the latest version 0.6-1.
Have you tried contacting the Debian Mu
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 02:08:16 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS -- speedtest-cli - A command line client for the
speedtest.net
has caused the Debian Bug report #738581,
regarding RFS -- speedtest-cli - A command line client for the speedtest.net
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 02:02:29 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: plainbox-provider-resource-generic/0.2-2 [ITP] --
PlainBox resources provider
has caused the Debian Bug report #735188,
regarding RFS: plainbox-provider-resource-generic/0.2-2 [ITP] -- PlainBox
resource
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 02:05:53 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: plainbox-provider-resource-generic/0.2-2 -- new
packaging version
has caused the Debian Bug report #737039,
regarding RFS: plainbox-provider-resource-generic/0.2-2 -- new packaging version
to be marked a
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 02:04:40 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: [sponsorship-requests] autoconf archive
has caused the Debian Bug report #735594,
regarding [sponsorship-requests] autoconf archive
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 02:05:22 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: plainbox-provider-checkbox/0.3-2 -- new packaging
version
has caused the Debian Bug report #737041,
regarding RFS: plainbox-provider-checkbox/0.3-2 -- new packaging version
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 02:03:20 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: plainbox-provider-checkbox/0.3-2 [ITP] -- CheckBox
provider for PlainBox
has caused the Debian Bug report #735244,
regarding RFS: plainbox-provider-checkbox/0.3-2 [ITP] -- CheckBox provider for
PlainBox
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 01:56:43 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: pgtop/3.7.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #738274,
regarding RFS: pgtop/3.7.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 01:53:54 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: palo/1.92 [ITA] -- parisc bootloader
has caused the Debian Bug report #735124,
regarding RFS: palo/1.92 [ITA] -- parisc bootloader
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 01:41:35 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: podget/0.6.16-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #699723,
regarding RFS: podget/0.6.15-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 01:41:35 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: podget/0.6.16-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #699723,
regarding RFS: podget/0.6.16-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 01:44:27 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: pgtop/3.7.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #739638,
regarding RFS: pgtop/3.7.0-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 01:41:35 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: podget/0.6.16-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #699723,
regarding RFS: podget/0.6.15-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 01:35:10 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: kerneltop/0.91-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #737390,
regarding RFS: kerneltop/0.91-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 01:35:10 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: kerneltop/0.91-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #733258,
regarding RFS: kerneltop/0.9-1 -- shows linux kernel function usage in a style
like top
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Wences René Arana Fuentes
wrote:
>>>
>>
>> I use git-buildpackage, and forget to put the --pristine-tar option,
>> sorry. I will delete this and upload the right orig/package
>>
>> Cheers o/
>>
>>
>
> Hi!
> I reupload the package now using --pristine-tar option[
21 matches
Mail list logo
