Bug#730445: RFS: plsense/0.10+git20131030-1 [ITP]

2014-03-29 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Hilko Bengen wrote: > I have looked at revision 0.20-1 and I'd be happy to upload your > package. > Thanks for your interest :-) > About the Lintian warnings (binary-without-manpage): I noticed that > /usr/bin/plsense actually contains some help. Using Pod

Re: RFS: procmeter3/3.6-1

2014-03-29 Thread Wences René Arana Fuentes
>> > > I use git-buildpackage, and forget to put the --pristine-tar option, > sorry. I will delete this and upload the right orig/package > > Cheers o/ > > Hi! I reupload the package now using --pristine-tar option[0], thanks for reviewing. Cheers o/ [0] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/

Re: DEP8 tests using the built package source

2014-03-29 Thread Stephen Kitt
Hi Andreas, On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:33:06 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:47:45AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:35:33 +0100, Andreas Tille > > wrote: > > > In other words what we can see in the log above conflicts with the > > > documentation if ma

Bug#730445: RFS: plsense/0.10+git20131030-1 [ITP]

2014-03-29 Thread Hilko Bengen
* KURASHIKI Satoru: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "plsense" I have looked at revision 0.20-1 and I'd be happy to upload your package. About the Lintian warnings (binary-without-manpage): I noticed that /usr/bin/plsense actually contains some help. Using Pod::Usage might be a good

Re: netcdf packages

2014-03-29 Thread Eric L.
Hi, On 28 March 2014 09:20:01 CET, Dominique Dumont wrote: >On Thursday 27 March 2014 22:21:55 Nico Schlömer wrote: >The question is: how to avoid breaking the above package when upgrading >netcdf >to netcdf-c, netcdf-fortran, netcdf-cxx ? What about declaring netcdf-bin as dummy package dependi