Bug#728136: marked as done (RFS: dmaths/3.5.1.1+dfsg1-1 (PAckage already in Debian))

Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2014 04:27:10 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: dmaths/3.5.1.1+dfsg1-1 (PAckage already in Debian) has caused the Debian Bug report #728136, regarding RFS: dmaths/3.5.1.1+dfsg1-1 (PAckage already in Debian) to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: Splitting in /usr/lib/ and /usr/share

Bartosz Feński writes: >> I am packaging some older software (eso-midas, [1]) that installs >> everything into a common directory (f.e. /usr/lib/eso-midas/). However, >> the FHS requires that this should be split between /usr/share/ and >> /usr/lib//. In the majority of cases, this could be done >

Bug#741055: marked as done (RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-4)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2014 16:27:41 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #741055, regarding RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Re: Splitting in /usr/lib/ and /usr/share

W dniu 08.03.2014 14:02, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr pisze: > Hi, > > I am packaging some older software (eso-midas, [1]) that installs > everything into a common directory (f.e. /usr/lib/eso-midas/). However, > the FHS requires that this should be split between /usr/share/ and > /usr/lib//. In the majority of c

Splitting in /usr/lib/ and /usr/share

Hi, I am packaging some older software (eso-midas, [1]) that installs everything into a common directory (f.e. /usr/lib/eso-midas/). However, the FHS requires that this should be split between /usr/share/ and /usr/lib//. In the majority of cases, this could be done automatically by recognizing the