Re: Bug#740482: RFS: [RC][security] imagemagick/8:6.7.7.10-8

2014-03-03 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2014-03-02 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Le 2 mars 2014 16:19, "Andreas Metzler" a écrit : >> On 2014-03-02 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "imagemagick" [...] >> Uploaded. > Rejected by ftpmaster* reuploaded repacked on mentor. [...] Hello Bastien, I

Bug#740626: RFS: libde265/0.5-1 ITP

2014-03-03 Thread Joachim Bauch
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libde265" * Package name: libde265 Version : 0.5-1 Upstream Author : struktur AG * URL : https://github.com/strukturag/libde265 * License : LGPL Section

Re: Weird conffile case

2014-03-03 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
On 3 March 2014 16:41, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Monday 03 March 2014 16:23:28 Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: >> I agree this is a nice solution with a patch, I will integrate it for sure. >> However what should be done in such situation with bug 740332 ? >> Should I close it with the new release

Re: Weird conffile case

2014-03-03 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday 03 March 2014 16:23:28 Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: > I agree this is a nice solution with a patch, I will integrate it for sure. > However what should be done in such situation with bug 740332 ? > Should I close it with the new release? ok, I did not realize that the upgrade test is don

Re: Weird conffile case

2014-03-03 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
On 3 March 2014 13:51, Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Monday 03 March 2014 08:59:01 Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: >> It is upstream's choice. But I will include such a patch, it is quite >> trivial. But this is not the case here. >> The problem is that installing the package asks for users' decision

Re: Weird conffile case

2014-03-03 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday 03 March 2014 08:59:01 Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: > It is upstream's choice. But I will include such a patch, it is quite > trivial. But this is not the case here. > The problem is that installing the package asks for users' decision > (keep config, replace with maintainer, etc). > Appl

Re: Weird conffile case

2014-03-03 Thread Dariusz Dwornikowski
On 2 March 2014 21:45, Russ Allbery wrote: > Dariusz Dwornikowski writes: > >> The previous maintainer of maradns modified conffiles in postinst >> (dynamically checked for the maradns user id and filled >> /etc/maradns/mararc with this info). This obviously rendered RC bug of >> violation of pol