Hi,
I've uploaded an updated version with two minor changes :
* debian/control: drop the Replaces field for eggdrop-data (according
to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698599#12 )
* debian/changelog: Closes ITA #698272
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@l
2014-03-02 0:41 GMT+01:00 gregor herrmann :
> On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 22:55:20 +0100, Emilien Klein wrote:
>
>> One minor challenge that I faced is that I couldn't get the commands to
>> run using su. With the help of Karsten Hilbert I understood that the
>> issue was that the user being a system user,
+++ Jan Dittberner [2014-03-02 16:19 +0100]:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 04:11:58PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > what is the consensus about using stable (s/testing/jessie/g in
> > sources.list) for maintaining Debian packages (in conjunction with a sid
> > VM or a chroot to make sure
Your message dated Mon, 3 Mar 2014 00:32:26 +0200
with message-id <20140302223226.gl4...@bunk.dyndns.info>
and subject line nagiosplugins has already been uploaded to unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #734019,
regarding RFS: nagiosplugin/1.2-1 [ITP] -- Python class library for writing
Nagi
Le 2 mars 2014 16:19, "Andreas Metzler" a écrit :
>
> On 2014-03-02 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
>
> > Dear mentors,
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "imagemagick"
> [...]
> >
Dariusz Dwornikowski writes:
> The previous maintainer of maradns modified conffiles in postinst
> (dynamically checked for the maradns user id and filled
> /etc/maradns/mararc with this info). This obviously rendered RC bug of
> violation of policy 10.7.3 [2]. I closed the bug in a new release b
Your message dated Sun, 2 Mar 2014 21:44:03 +0200
with message-id <20140302194403.gf4...@bunk.dyndns.info>
and subject line healpix-cxx has already been uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #737698,
regarding RFS: healpix-cxx/3.11.2-2 [ITP] -- C++ language interface for
Hierarchical Equal Are
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-03-02 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>> Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
>
>> Dear mentors,
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "imagemagick"
> [...]
>>
Your message dated Sun, 02 Mar 2014 16:29:54 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: qgis/2.2.0-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #740452,
regarding RFS: qgis/2.2.0-1~exp1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eggdrop"
* Package name: eggdrop
Version : 1.6.21-1
Upstream Author : EggHeads Development Team
* URL : http://www.eggheads.org/
* License : GPL-
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 04:11:58PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
> hi,
>
> what is the consensus about using stable (s/testing/jessie/g in
> sources.list) for maintaining Debian packages (in conjunction with a sid
> VM or a chroot to make sure it always builds)?
Packages targeted for sid must always
On 2014-03-02 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
> Dear mentors,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "imagemagick"
[...]
> Changes since the last upload:
> Fix three security bug
Uploaded.
hi,
what is the consensus about using stable (s/testing/jessie/g in
sources.list) for maintaining Debian packages (in conjunction with a sid
VM or a chroot to make sure it always builds)?
The problem with testing is that I spend >2-3 hours a week backing up
data, apt-get dist-upgrade and making s
On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 08:38:06 +0100, Ross Gammon wrote:
> >> 'gbp
> >> buildpackage' fails because it detects altered files in the source code.
> > Ah, here it is in the manpage:
> > --git-export=treeish
> Thanks Gregor, but I was already aware of --git-export=WC &
> --git-ignore-new. I have
You wrote:
* Upstream is the same as Debian maintainer.
Therefore, build a native Debian package
IMO, that's a very bad idea. this is a pain for downstream Debian
derivative who may want to add specific patches. With a native package,
it becomes less convenient to add distro-specific patche
On 2014-03-02 12:05, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after I moved one of my packages (iausofa-c) from main to non-free, I
> had for some time the problem that the source still appeared in
> main. This, however, was solved "somehow" without any notice.
>
> However, now I get the migration "excuse"
+++ Ross Gammon [2014-03-01 23:37 +0100]:
> Now you have all helped me to realise that I can spam with 'debian/rules
> build' to test if it fixes a FTBFS, or 'fakeroot debian/rules binary' to
> go all the way to a 'deb' which I can try installing.
(And very usefully, just retry the packaging step
Hi,
after I moved one of my packages (iausofa-c) from main to non-free, I
had for some time the problem that the source still appeared in
main. This, however, was solved "somehow" without any notice.
However, now I get the migration "excuse" [1] "Section:
non-free/science". What does this mean? T
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "imagemagick"
* Package name: imagemagick
Version : 8:6.7.7.10-8
Section : graphics
It builds those binary p
hi,
I would like to request some advice on a case I need to resolve with
maradns package [1].
The previous maintainer of maradns modified conffiles in postinst
(dynamically checked for the maradns user id and filled
/etc/maradns/mararc with this info). This obviously rendered RC bug of
violation
20 matches
Mail list logo
