Re: Handling daemons that fail to start

2014-02-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > So the workflow would be "install the package, see it cannot be used, > uninstall it"? Probably, plus documentation in the package description about where it can and cannot be installed. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Handling daemons that fail to start

2014-02-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:53:23AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Seems pointless to allow installing on systems where the CPU isn't > supported. I would just close the bug, unless there is some debugging > tool in the package that would help adding support for the CPU. So the workflow would be "install

Bug#739732: RFS: osgearth/2.5.0+dfsg-0~exp1

2014-02-21 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osgearth" Package name: osgearth Version : 2.5.0+dfsg-0~exp1 Upstream Author : Glenn Waldron URL : http://osgearth.org/ License : LGPL-3 Section :

Re: How to mark bugs which solution is in the documentation?

2014-02-21 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Joseph Herlant wrote: > I found several bugs which solution is provided by the documentation. > How do we properly mark these bugs once the link to the given > documentation has been provided? Just follow up with the link to the documentation in a mail to -done, and that's goo

Bug#738193: marked as done (RFS: viewnior/1.4-1 [ITP])

2014-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:27:58 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: viewnior/1.4-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #738193, regarding RFS: viewnior/1.4-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#739690: marked as done (RFS: liblas/1.7.0+dfsg-4)

2014-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:28:03 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: liblas/1.7.0+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #739690, regarding RFS: liblas/1.7.0+dfsg-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#739653: marked as done (RFS: liblas/1.7.0+dfsg-3)

2014-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:48:17 +0100 with message-id <53073d01.8060...@xs4all.nl> and subject line Re: Bug#739653: RFS: liblas/1.7.0+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #739653, regarding RFS: liblas/1.7.0+dfsg-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#739585: RFS: qjoypad/4.1.0-1 ITP

2014-02-21 Thread Juhani Numminen
Hi, I would like to give my suggestion of categories for the desktop file. How about Categories=Settings;HardwareSettings;? > Categories=Utility;Game; If the categories include two "main categories", such as Game and Utility, the program may appear two times in the menu. http://standards.freede

Bug#739690: RFS: liblas/1.7.0+dfsg-4

2014-02-21 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "liblas" Package name: liblas Version : 1.7.0+dfsg-4 Upstream Author : Howard Butler, Mateusz Loskot, Phil Vachon, Martin Vales & Frank Warmerdam URL : http://libla

How to mark bugs which solution is in the documentation?

2014-02-21 Thread Joseph Herlant
Dear mentors, I found several bugs which solution is provided by the documentation. How do we properly mark these bugs once the link to the given documentation has been provided? Set it as notfound and as done? Thanks for your advice, Joseph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@l