Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pdfcrack". I am a DM and
I need the first upload only.
* Package name: pdfcrack
Version : 0.11-3
Upstream Author : Henning Noren
* URL : http://sf.net/proje
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 23:54:43 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > The following seems to work:
> >
> > version=3
> > opts=downloadurlmangle=s{([\d.]+)$}{$&/ssake_v$1-tar.gz}g \
> > http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)
>
> Hmmm, it just drops the tarball named
>
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shc"
* Package name: shc
Version : 3.8.9-1
Upstream Author : Francisco Rosales .
* URL : http://www.datsi.fi.upm.es/~frosal/
* License : GPL-2.0
S
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 06:49:25PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:55:13 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > uscan: In debian/watch, potentially unsafe or malformed downloadurlmangle
> > pattern:
> > 's/software\/ssake\/releases\/([.\d]+)/&\/ssake_v$1-tar.gz/"' found.
> >
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:55:13 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> version=3
> opts=downloadurlmangle=s/software\/ssake\/releases\/([.\d]+)/&\/ssake_v$1-tar.gz/"
> \
> http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)
> uscan: In debian/watch, potentially unsafe or malformed downloa
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:29:42 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: sane-backends/1.0.24-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #728292,
regarding RFS: sane-backends/1.0.24-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Sorry. My last solution is very simplist and doesn't allow downloads.
Please, try it:
version=3
http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases/([\d.]*)/
ssake_v(\d\S*)-tar.gz
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014/1/18 Eriberto :
> A simple solution:
>
> version=3
> http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/
Hi Eriberto,
thanks for you quick response,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 02:04:04PM -0200, Eriberto wrote:
> A simple solution:
>
> version=3
> http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases
> .*/ssake/releases/(\d\S*)
I tested this but this only drops a single file named
3.8.1
co
A simple solution:
version=3
http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases
.*/ssake/releases/(\d\S*)
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014/1/18 Andreas Tille :
>
> Any help to fix the watch file?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
Hi,
the current watch file for ssake fails finding any version. The reason
is that the upstream download page
http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/ssake/releases
has dedicated download pages for every single download tarball. I tried
to fix this using the following watch file
vers
On 18 January 2014 06:35, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> Would you consider changing the name of the source package back to
> zeroinstall-injector? This won't impact end users (the binary package
> is 0install now; that's what end users will see, and that's what
> they
Hi Dererk.
El Sábado, 18 de enero de 2014 11:09:41 Dererk escribió:
> I found that there's a missing (strong) dependency on the kde desktop
> side that renders this package unusable, that pkg is kde-zeroconf.
> I'm using a very lightweight set of kde packages and this appears to be
> the only miss
Thanks for sponsoring it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140118142157.427e1...@realh.co.uk
Hi Vincent,
Thank you for the uploading. I will surely eliminate the problems next time.
Best Regards,
Yongzhi Pan
On 18 January 2014 01:35, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
> wrote:
>> On 17 January 2014 17:59, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
>>> * debian/copyright:
>>> + forgot the debian/* license
>>
>> isn't needed, since 3.9.3.
>
> I'm not quite sure
Hi Arnout.
Would you like to maintain this package together with me? I cannot
sponsor it, but I am a DM, so after a few sponsored uploads, a DD can
grant me upload access to this package. This might be good for future
releases. If this sounds good, add me to the Maintainer: field.
Also, who spons
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jan 2014 01:01:43 -0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: 4digits/1.1.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #734841,
regarding RFS: 4digits/1.1.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jan 2014 00:54:06 -0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: roxterm/2.8.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #735598,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.8.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi,
I've only taken a brief look at hwinfo so far, but I've noticed the following:
- Judging by your *.install files, I assume that you want to have your
packages support multiarch, but you're not quite done with the
implementation. e.g. debian/control: libhd20 needs to
19 matches
Mail list logo
