-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/13 19:21, Dominik George wrote:
>> [2] http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=vpcs_0.5b0-1
>
> In that special case, I'd even say your versioning "mistake" is
> good because upstream's ~ notation is a mess. That char is reserved
> for Debian
>[2] http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=vpcs_0.5b0-1
In that special case, I'd even say your versioning "mistake" is good because
upstream's ~ notation is a mess. That char is reserved for Debian ;) (yes,
that's false and not so humble ;))!
Why not keep your version numbering as it is and u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/13 18:59, Dominik George wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I have realised that in an earlier package upload, I made a
>> blunder with regards the version of the package.
>
>
> Where is that package now? On mentors, or in Debian?
>
> -nik
>
>
The packa
Hi,
>I have realised that in an earlier package upload, I made a blunder
>with regards the version of the package.
Where is that package now? On mentors, or in Debian?
-nik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
Daniel Lintott wrote:
[..]
> I have realised that in an earlier package upload, I made a blunder
> with regards the version of the package.
> The package was versioned as 0.5b0-1, though I somehow missed, despite
> testing the watch file that this should have been 0.5~b0-1.
> I have seen some di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I have realised that in an earlier package upload, I made a blunder
with regards the version of the package.
The package was versioned as 0.5b0-1, though I somehow missed, despite
testing the watch file that this should have been 0.5~b0
Hi Wookey,
> So I'll upload as-is.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52a727f4.2090...@aloah-from-hell.de
+++ Werner Detter [2013-12-10 10:57 +0100]:
> Am 10.12.13 09:04, schrieb gregor herrmann:
> > On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:14:02 +0100, Werner Detter wrote:
> >
> > -. /lib/init/vars.sh
> > . /lib/lsb/init-functions
> >>>
> >>> You'll have to explain to me why this is right? /lib/init/vars.sh s
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:57:24 +0100, Werner Detter wrote:
> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710559
> >> So, I took it out.
> > deactivated it in lintian git for the time being.
> Yes .. but .. Josh states:
> > /etc/init.d/skeleton is wrong; only sysvinit's own internal scripts
>
Am 10.12.13 09:04, schrieb gregor herrmann:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:14:02 +0100, Werner Detter wrote:
>
> -. /lib/init/vars.sh
> . /lib/lsb/init-functions
>>>
>>> You'll have to explain to me why this is right? /lib/init/vars.sh still
>>> exists and appears to contain default values. Alt
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 07:14:02 +0100, Werner Detter wrote:
> >>> -. /lib/init/vars.sh
> >>> . /lib/lsb/init-functions
> >
> > You'll have to explain to me why this is right? /lib/init/vars.sh still
> > exists and appears to contain default values. Although it does seem the
> > the policyd-weight i
11 matches
Mail list logo
