Re: How to deal with "error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line"

2013-11-10 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I tried to add gio here but configure fails when I'm doing so. Any idea > how to do this correctly? Change the first instance to this: PKG_CHECK_MODULES([GTK], [gtk+-2.0 >= 2.12 glib-2.0 >= 2.14 gio-2.0], , [ -- bye, pabs http://wiki.de

Re: Debian/Ubuntu Package Developing with Docker

2013-11-10 Thread T o n g
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 19:36:16 -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: >> I found that Docker is the best tool for developing Debian/Ubuntu >> packages, but seems no one has talked about it in Debian world > > In fact, I have. I've got a few tools brewing for Debian that use > Docker. I've got it packaged a

Bug#729091: RFS: gtkiostream/1.3.0

2013-11-10 Thread Matt Flax
Hi, Should be working now ... I have uploaded gtkiostream-1.3.0.fixDeb3.tar.gz to sf.net : https://sourceforge.net/projects/gtkiostream/files/Version%201.3.0/? I have now stopped the system building the ORBTest test. It isn't necessary for the software. I can't work out how or why with this b

Re: Debian/Ubuntu Package Developing with Docker

2013-11-10 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:30:33AM +, T o n g wrote: > Hi, > > I found that Docker is the best tool for developing Debian/Ubuntu > packages, but seems no one has talked about it in Debian world In fact, I have. I've got a few tools brewing for Debian that use Docker. I've got it packaged an

Debian/Ubuntu Package Developing with Docker

2013-11-10 Thread T o n g
Hi, I found that Docker is the best tool for developing Debian/Ubuntu packages, but seems no one has talked about it in Debian world. So here is mine [1]. [1] http://sfxpt.wordpress.com/2013/11/10/debianubuntu-package-developing- with-docker/ If you build your packages with pbuilder, then you

Re: How to deal with "error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line"

2013-11-10 Thread Andreas Moog
On 10.11.2013 23:01, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 09:13:07PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> >>> That seems obvious to me but I wonder whether this is not part of the >>> result of pkg-config ... >> >> Neither of the

Re: How to deal with "error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line"

2013-11-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 09:13:07PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > That seems obvious to me but I wonder whether this is not part of the > > result of pkg-config ... > > Neither of the uses of PKG_CHECK_MODULES include gio: > > http:

Bug#728716: xchroot: packaging as non-free

2013-11-10 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
Am 08.11.2013 18:04, schrieb Paul Tagliamonte: Email ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org with your license, and the ftpteam will disucss if we can distribute it safely. If so, you can upload it to non-free. Ask your sponsor for more information on that. Please note that non-free is *not* Debian (th

Bug#729091: RFS: gtkiostream/1.3.0

2013-11-10 Thread Daniel Lintott
Hi Matt, On 09/11/13 23:21, Matt Flax wrote: > You caught another bug, thank you. I have uploaded > gtkiostream-1.3.0.fixedDeb2.tar.gz to the sf.net site. > > I have removed the machineGenerated directory from the source dist. by > using 'nodist' tags in the Makefile.am. > > This should be the l

Bug#728716: [License-review] For Approval: Scripting Free Software License, Version 1.3.5 (S-FSL v1.3.5)

2013-11-10 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 05:07:00PM +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: > > Am 08.11.2013 16:33, schrieb Paul Tagliamonte: > >On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 04:15:30PM +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: > "specific to someone": Well this is an unavoidable necessity in order to > >>>Maybe, but specific clau

Bug#728716: [License-review] For Approval: Scripting Free Software License, Version 1.3.5 (S-FSL v1.3.5)

2013-11-10 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
Am 08.11.2013 16:33, schrieb Paul Tagliamonte: On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 04:15:30PM +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: "specific to someone": Well this is an unavoidable necessity in order to Maybe, but specific clauses like this clearly violate OSD #3 and #5 (#3: if your downstream “A” is a “publ

Bug#717577: marked as done (RFS: engauge-digitizer/5.2-1)

2013-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:27:23 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: engauge-digitizer/5.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #717577, regarding RFS: engauge-digitizer/5.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#713810: marked as done (RFS: simplenat/0.1 [ITP])

2013-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:27:23 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: simplenat/0.1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #713810, regarding RFS: simplenat/0.1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#729237: RFS: netmate/0.1.9-1 [ITP] -- netdude clone that shows pcap dump lines in network header style

2013-11-10 Thread Eriberto
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "netmate". I am a DM and I need the first upload only. * Package name: netmate Version : 0.1.9-1 Upstream Author : Robert Krause * URL : https://github.com/Ru

Bug#729208: marked as done (RFS: pasystray/0.4.0-1 [ITP])

2013-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2013 22:53:21 +1100 with message-id <527f73b1.8010...@sl.id.au> and subject line pasystray in NEW has caused the Debian Bug report #729208, regarding RFS: pasystray/0.4.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#729208: RFS: pasystray/0.4.0-1 [ITP]

2013-11-10 Thread Scott Leggett
On 10/11/13 20:10, Vincent Bernat wrote: > > Hi Scott! Hi Vincent. > > Why do you explictely depends on libraries instead of relying on > ${shlibs:Depends}? I suppose there is a good reason for that but I am > lazy to test. I didn't catch any other issue. > No, there is no good reason for tha

Bug#729208: RFS: pasystray/0.4.0-1 [ITP]

2013-11-10 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 10 novembre 2013 09:15 CET, Scott Leggett  : > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pasystray" > > Package name: pasystray > Version : 0.4.0-1 > Upstream Author : Christoph Gysin > URL : https://github.com/christophgysin/pasystray > License : LGPL-2.1

Bug#729208: RFS: pasystray/0.4.0-1 [ITP]

2013-11-10 Thread Scott Leggett
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pasystray" Package name: pasystray Version : 0.4.0-1 Upstream Author : Christoph Gysin URL : https://github.com/christophgysin/pasystray License : LGPL-