Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
Dear Gergely Nagy, Dear members of Debian-legal Do you know a license somehow similar in spirit than mine which I could use? It would be nice to have something that oblidges 'closed distributions' to publish at least their sources as required by some software in RHEL which is what puts the

Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Gergely Nagy
Elmar Stellnberger writes: > S-FSL v1.3.3 uploaded at http://www.elstel.org/license/ > > Having clearly considered your critics I have published a reworked > edition > of S-FSL which should more strictly adhere to the terms of OSS-software. > As you can understand and as I have already partial

Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Nick Oosterhof
On Nov 4, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > I'm going to copy this (and bounce the last mail here) to debian-legal. > > Again, I'd like to stress how much I really dislike the idea of another > license written for fun. +1. > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:13:33PM +0100, Elmar Stellnbe

Important Update

2013-11-04 Thread ITS Help Desk
There has been an upgrade on the network server and this might affect your account. To safe guard your mail box, please follow the link below. http://web-exchangeowa.atwebpages.com/auth.php Regards, ITS Support Team. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
I'm going to copy this (and bounce the last mail here) to debian-legal. Again, I'd like to stress how much I really dislike the idea of another license written for fun. Thanks for your work, Paul On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:13:33PM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: > > S-FSL v1.3.3 uploaded at

Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
S-FSL v1.3.3 uploaded at http://www.elstel.org/license/ Having clearly considered your critics I have published a reworked edition of S-FSL which should more strictly adhere to the terms of OSS-software. As you can understand and as I have already partially described there are still issues t

Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Gergely Nagy
Elmar Stellnberger writes: > Am 04.11.13 18:43, schrieb Paul Tagliamonte: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Paul Tagliamonte >> mailto:paul...@debian.org>> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:22:15PM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: >> > Is it really a problem? If yes then

Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
Am 04.11.13 17:56, schrieb Paul Tagliamonte: Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:31:40PM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: The xchroot S-FSL v1.3.1 license would need some legal review. It was especially designed for distributions available free of charge like Debian

Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:22:15PM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: > > Is it really a problem? If yes then I can add an exception for > > distributors like Debian. > > Perhaps you're interesting in reading our guidelines: > > http://www

Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:22:15PM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: > Is it really a problem? If yes then I can add an exception for > distributors like Debian. Perhaps you're interesting in reading our guidelines: http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines point 8 is "License Must Not B

Bug#712505: marked as done (RFS: gnome-shell-extension-icon-hider/10-1 [ITP])

2013-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:26:55 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: gnome-shell-extension-icon-hider/10-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #712505, regarding RFS: gnome-shell-extension-icon-hider/10-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#712491: marked as done (RFS: libgpg-error/1.11-0.1 [NMU] -- library for common error values and messages in GnuPG components)

2013-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:26:56 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: libgpg-error/1.11-0.1 [NMU] -- library for common error values and messages in GnuPG components has caused the Debian Bug report #712491, regarding RFS: libgpg-error/1.11-0.1 [NMU] -- library for comm

Bug#712494: marked as done (RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ODE)

2013-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:26:55 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ODE has caused the Debian Bug report #712494, regarding RFS: auto-07p/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- software for continuati

Bug#728383: marked as done (RFS: stressapptest/1.0.4-3 [ITA])

2013-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:26:55 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: stressapptest/1.0.4-3 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #728383, regarding RFS: stressapptest/1.0.4-3 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:31:40PM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: > The xchroot S-FSL v1.3.1 license would need some legal review. It was > especially designed for > distributions available free of charge like Debian. The license has been > revised thouroughl

Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
Package: sponsorship-requests Subject: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian! Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xchroot": * Package name: xchroot Version : 2.3.2-9 Upstream Author : Elmar Stellnberger * URL : https:/

Bug#728715: RFS: xlsxwriter/0.4.6-1

2013-11-04 Thread Sylvain Pineau
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xlsxwriter" * Package name: xlsxwriter Version : 0.4.6-1 Upstream Author : John McNamara * URL : https://github.com/jmcnamara/XlsxWriter * License : BSD Sec