Please read the devref section about reintroducing packages:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#reintroducing-pkgs
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Hi Etienne,
Sébastien Villemot has kindly offered to sponsor the package as part
of debian-science. Is that okay with you?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debi
Paul,
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 11-08-13 13:43, Robert J. Clay wrote:
>>I figure to reopen that bug but which would best for it to be? As
>> an ITP, because it isn't currently in unstable or testing? Or as an
>> ITA, because it had been packaged and is present
Il 11/08/2013 19:47, Paul Wise ha scritto:
> A review:
>
> Blockers:
>
> The changes to debian/copyright_hints look weird, could you explain?
I do not understand what you mean.
The whole content of debian/copyright_hints usually looks weird to me, but it
is useful to:
1) write debian/copyright
Hi!
Faré writes:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_3.0.2-1.dsc
Upstream tarbal is
6f78cb311f9b8756ebed5924a6bd7302e283ccbf
The dsc mentions
7987d33bafe5a1f0fa91a7380a3594206a5a0cdb
Is this intenti
Your message dated Sun, 11 Aug 2013 21:38:38 +0200
with message-id <20130811193838.GA31975@kronk>
and subject line Re: Please upload hiredis 0.11.0-3?
has caused the Debian Bug report #719286,
regarding RFS: hiredis/0.11.0-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> owner 719286 gh...@debian.org
> tags 719286 pending
> kthxbye
>
> [ also CCing the RFS bug ]
>
> On sab, ago 10, 2013 at 09:32:29 -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> > Hey Alessandro,
>
> Hi,
>
> > Not sure if this is the right email address to cont
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Andreas,
I'm happy to help with the upload of libpar2 and nzbget.
On 2013-07-18 21:46:37, Andreas Moog wrote:
> I uploaded a new version to mentors:
>
> libpar2 (0.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * New Upstream Release:
> - Soname bump due to ABI change
> - Does
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 04:16:31PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > > > Thanks Kumar - the "-k " did it! I saw it in --help, but I
> > > > didn't think I would need it if I only had the one key. Why didn't I
> > > > try it?!?
> > > You don't need to pass -k or similar options to any Debian tool
On 11-08-13 13:43, Robert J. Clay wrote:
>I figure to reopen that bug but which would best for it to be? As
> an ITP, because it isn't currently in unstable or testing? Or as an
> ITA, because it had been packaged and is present in oldstable?
As the package is currently not in Debian unstabl
All,
I found while working on setting up a new PC that an app I've been
using (keysafe) isn't in wheezy (but is present in squeeze). I also
found it's RFA/O bug, which was closed when it was dropped from
unstable/testing. (I think that's because it was orphaned, but I need
to find out for sur
owner 719286 gh...@debian.org
tags 719286 pending
kthxbye
[ also CCing the RFS bug ]
On sab, ago 10, 2013 at 09:32:29 -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> Hey Alessandro,
Hi,
> Not sure if this is the right email address to contact you on, but I've
> forwarded my upload request for hiredis on to debian-ment
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:16:59PM -0400, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > > > Personally, I use debsign -k to ensure
> > > > that my package is signed. Following this, you can open the
> > > > changes file and the dsc file to see that they have been
> > > > clearsigned.
> > >
> > > Thanks Kumar - the
Andreas Moog writes:
> On 10.08.2013 13:18, Steven Hamilton wrote:
>
> Apologies for the copy per mail, I was hitting the wrong button.
>
>> Done. Sorry for the time wasting. I should've done this to begin
>> with.
>>
>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/mrrescue
>>
>
> Hmm, looks indeed like a
14 matches
Mail list logo
