I have two ITA packages, both with RFS bugs created.
Based on the review and comments on one package, I realized that the other
package needs a lot more work before uploading it. So, in hindsight, I
shouldn't have opened an RFS for it yet.
But since I did, what is the preferred way to handle th
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "cloudprint"
Package name: cloudprint
Version: 0.10-3
Upstream Author: Jason Michalski
URL: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cloudprint
License: GPL3
Section: net
It
* Robinson Sathaseevan , 2013-06-18, 13:41:
When I re-build, should it still be -1 until it actually gets uploaded
or should I increment to -2, -3, etc. each time?
The former.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Wow! Thanks for the detailed analysis. I will have a look through all the
findings and fix as you listed. I did not know there were python specific
tests and packager available for me to use.
To answer your question: I don't know if the original manpage typos patch
was sent upstream but I will sen
1) buildflags.patch / build type
First of all, the patch works fine. Actually, after removing the forced
variable overrides Cmake
recognizes already the standard environment build flags.
I've came across that Debhelper 20130504 was set to always switch to
RelWithDebInfo build type
(#701233), wh
On 18 June 2013 15:29, Franz Schrober wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> is it possible with dh/debhelper to enabling specific compiler flags easily
> depending on the gcc-defaults package/gcc version? Problem is the GCC 4.8
> version which currently needs -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations until some
> source co
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Charles Plessy , 2013-06-18, 08:33:
>
>> Have you considered running the tests with autopkgtest ?
>>
>>http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep8/
>>
>> Then, you can either download the data or install it from a separate data
>> package.
>
>
> No, y
Hi,
is it possible with dh/debhelper to enabling specific compiler flags easily
depending on the gcc-defaults package/gcc version? Problem is the GCC 4.8
version which currently needs -fno-aggressive-loop-optimizations until some
source code depending on some non-standard compliant behaviour are
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Please see:
> http://clang.debian.net/
Also:
http://buildd-clang.debian.net/package.php
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On 2013-06-18 12:05 , Richi Lists wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> gcc is the default compiler for debian, and all the libraries in the
> repository are compiled with gcc.
> clang is also in the repository. But if I want to compile anything other
> than the simplest toy program, I also need libraries. M
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Build type is better to leave as "RELWITHDEBINFO". This might be
> useful if you decide to provide -dbg package or just to (re-)build
> with debugging info with command like
Technically RelWithDebInfo should not be used anymore with cmake
* Charles Plessy , 2013-06-18, 08:33:
Have you considered running the tests with autopkgtest ?
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep8/
Then, you can either download the data or install it from a separate
data package.
No, you can't assume that Internet connectivity will be available to
your tes
> > Why is it so hard to get sponsor and why is there nobody who tries to
> > support the jabber uploads ;)
> Well, as I am in the same shoes, we can make a deal. We can try to
> review each other's packages, trying to fix bugs and give
> recommendations supporting each other. This way, we could
Hi Willem
On 18/06/13 07:56, W. van den Akker wrote:
I find it very disappointing that for the second time I cannot manage to
get some packages in.
I read a lot mailings about the bad shape some packages are in. But if
newcomers dont have a chance (well not everyone ;))
to adopt packages then th
On 18 June 2013 11:05, Richi Lists wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> gcc is the default compiler for debian, and all the libraries in the
> repository are compiled with gcc.
> clang is also in the repository. But if I want to compile anything other
> than the simplest toy program, I also need libraries.
Hi everybody,
gcc is the default compiler for debian, and all the libraries in the
repository are compiled with gcc.
clang is also in the repository. But if I want to compile anything other
than the simplest toy program, I also need libraries. Maintaining them
by hand is a nightmare if you're used
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:18:25AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Package looks pretty good. However I cannot build it a second time.
> Looks like the clean rule is missing something:
It looks like that problem is a result of the switch from using the
shipped configure script to regenerating i
On 15 June 2013 13:43, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just uploaded the new version of xinetd on mentors and it needs a
> sponsor.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15-1.dsc
>
> it finally uses the latest upstream available version and closes 2 bugs with
My guess is that the intersection between people who have upload
access, experience, time, interest in running an XMPP server, aren't
already running other XMPP server software and are reading this list
is close to zero.
Daniel Pocock has been blogging about XMPP, federated services and
other rela
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Bill Blough wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Jakub!
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:40:44PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote
>> X: libxalan111: binary-file-built-without-LFS-support
>> usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libxalan-c.so.111.0
>> (It might be worth fixing upstream, but I'm not sure if
Hi Members,
Last February I mailed the list why some packages wont get a sponsor. I
got a few reactions of sponsors
who helped me to get the package into decent shape. But at the end no
sponsor would have time or experience with
the package to upload it. The jabber packages are obvious a strange
t
21 matches
Mail list logo
