Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2013 04:23:37 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: eggdrop/1.6.21-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #698599,
regarding RFS: eggdrop/1.6.21-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2013 04:23:32 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #711855,
regarding RFS: aircrack-ng/1:1.1-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2013 04:23:34 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: python-kmod/0.9-4 [ITP] (#696403)
has caused the Debian Bug report #696426,
regarding RFS: python-kmod/0.9-4 [ITP] (#696403)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> I'm not sure if beta versions are welcome on Debian or should be avoided
> if possible. My understanding is that it should be avoided if possible.
The main thing is that packages uploaded to unstable are destined for
the next D
Il 11/06/2013 00:03, Jakub Wilk ha scritto:
> * Giulio Paci , 2013-05-26, 15:27:
>>> Do you know what it FTBFS on amd64? Last time I checked amd64 was
>>> little-endian, so #707826 can't be the reason. ;)
>> The problem is not the same, but the fix is.
>
> Well, I'd rather have the test suite fix
* Giulio Paci , 2013-05-26, 15:27:
Do you know what it FTBFS on amd64? Last time I checked amd64 was
little-endian, so #707826 can't be the reason. ;)
The problem is not the same, but the fix is.
Well, I'd rather have the test suite fixed that disabled.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:23:51 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: lcmaps-plugins-jobrep/1.5.3-1 -- job repository
plugin for the LCMAPS framework
has caused the Debian Bug report #702328,
regarding RFS: lcmaps-plugins-jobrep/1.5.3-1 -- job repository plugin for the
On 10/06/13 14:50, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Why not work on aircrack-ng 1.2~beta1 instead ?
>
That's a good question.
I'm not sure if beta versions are welcome on Debian or should be avoided
if possible. My understanding is that it should be avoided if possible.
I was thinking in up
On 10/06/13 15:18, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 02:12:02PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> * Remove unused Build-Depends on obsolete libnl-dev (Closes: #688158)
> ---end quoted text---
>
> Why is netlink support disabled ?
>
1.1 don't supports netlink.
Only 1.2
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:47:13PM +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> >> >> How can I fix the "dpkg-deb: error: control directory has bad
> >> >> permissions" error?
> >> >>
> >> >> I was simply trying to use pbuilder-satisfydepends with the emacs
> >> >> source package.
> >> > Don't do that?
> >> Wh
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:30:58PM +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>> >> How can I fix the "dpkg-deb: error: control directory has bad
>> >> permissions" error?
>> >>
>> >> I was simply trying to use pbuilder-satisfydepends with the emacs
>> >> source package.
>> > Don't
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 02:12:02PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> * Remove unused Build-Depends on obsolete libnl-dev (Closes: #688158)
---end quoted text---
Why is netlink support disabled ?
--
أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
Digital design engineer
GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7
Hello,
Why not work on aircrack-ng 1.2~beta1 instead ?
--
أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
Digital design engineer
GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7
GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Am 10.06.2013 14:06, schrieb Andreas Tille:
Hi,
in Freeze time several uploads to experimental happened. Now we upload
updated versions of packages to unstable. How can we get easily rid of
the packages in experimental that are just unneeded there? Do I need to
file a ROM bug to ftpmaster for
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aircrack-ng"
* Package name: aircrack-ng
Version : 1:1.1-6
Upstream Author : Thomas d'Otreppe
* URL : http://www.aircrack-ng.org
* License : GPL-
Hi,
On 10.06.2013 14:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Do I need to
> file a ROM bug to ftpmaster for every single package that should vanish
> from experimental?
Yes. That.
Having that said, if you want to move a package from experimental to
unstable, just upload a newer version to sid, and it will be
Hi,
in Freeze time several uploads to experimental happened. Now we upload
updated versions of packages to unstable. How can we get easily rid of
the packages in experimental that are just unneeded there? Do I need to
file a ROM bug to ftpmaster for every single package that should vanish
from
17 matches
Mail list logo
