>>> Should I produce 2 different source packages
>>> for main and contrib from the same upstream project?
>>
>> Short answer:
>> Yes, this is the best solution in such case.
>> (If there is no any possibility to avoid non-free dependencies.)
>
> That's only if they're _build_ dependencies. Ru
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 02:28:14PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> > Should I produce 2 different source packages
> > for main and contrib from the same upstream project?
>
> Short answer:
> Yes, this is the best solution in such case.
> (If there is no any possibility to avoid non-fre
Hi Nicolas,
> Should I produce 2 different source packages
> for main and contrib from the same upstream project?
Short answer:
Yes, this is the best solution in such case.
(If there is no any possibility to avoid non-free dependencies.)
Some additional thoughts:
If tarball is quite small, you
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:56:25PM +0200, Nicolas Bourdaud wrote:
> My question is simple... Should I produce 2 different source packages
> for main and contrib from the same upstream project?
AFAIK yes.
--
WBR, wRAR
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
Hi all!
I am facing the problem of how to package a project that builds some
plugins that are completely free and some that have non-free
dependencies, although the source code of the plugins themself is
available under a free license. To simplify the explanation, I have in
the end 2 binar
5 matches
Mail list logo