Bug#697733: marked as done (RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-19 [RC])

2013-04-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2013 04:22:29 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-19 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #697733, regarding RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-19 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Re: newlisp

2013-04-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Nathan Owens wrote: > If the source build-depends depend on the arch how will I tell it to use > certain libraries > I tried doing like > > if [ "$ARCH" == "i386"]; > then > Build-Depends: > fi > > but cowbuilder says dpkg-source+(not+field-colon-value) error Plea

newlisp

2013-04-18 Thread Nathan Owens
If the source build-depends depend on the arch how will I tell it to use certain libraries I tried doing like if [ "$ARCH" == "i386"]; then Build-Depends: fi but cowbuilder says dpkg-source+(not+field-colon-value) error -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#696899: can anybody sponsor an ITP for premake4 ?

2013-04-18 Thread shirish शिरीष
Hi all, Just saw premake4.3-repack in NEW and that's great news. https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html Looking forward to hit it in experimental. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-

Bug#696899: can anybody sponsor an ITP for premake4 ?

2013-04-18 Thread Cameron Hart
Thanks! Experimental makes sense given how close Wheezy must be to being done. I wouldn't hold your breath on 4.4, it's an active project but not a terribly fast moving one. Also most of the development effort has moved onto a bit of a rewrite that will probably become 4.5 or 5. That said I've noti

Bug#696899: can anybody sponsor an ITP for premake4 ?

2013-04-18 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:33:54AM +1000, Cameron Hart wrote: > I've applied your changes and have updated to rules file to support > get-orig-source. I've used CDBS to do this, it has support for downloading > upstream tarballs and repacking them. > > I've uploaded a new version to mentors includ

Re: Changelog entry for bug workaround but no real fix?

2013-04-18 Thread Bart Martens
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:02:50PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > Dear all, > > a bug [1] was files against the the package (mia) I'm preparing that can > not really be fixed within this package, because the actual bug [2] is > in another, required package. Considering the ongoing freeze of wheezy,

Bug#705698: RFS: dwb/20130409hg-4

2013-04-18 Thread Nathan Owens
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwb" * Package name: dwb Version : 20130409hg-4 Upstream Author : Stefan Bolte * URL : http://portix.b

RFS: dwb/20130409hg-4

2013-04-18 Thread Nathan Owens
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwb" * Package name: dwb Version : 20130409hg-4 Upstream Author : Stefan Bolte * URL : http://portix.

Changelog entry for bug workaround but no real fix?

2013-04-18 Thread Gert Wollny
Dear all, a bug [1] was files against the the package (mia) I'm preparing that can not really be fixed within this package, because the actual bug [2] is in another, required package. Considering the ongoing freeze of wheezy, [2] may not be fixed soon, but I have a workaround in mia, that makes [