Bug#695588: RFS: jitsi/1.1.4365-1 [ITP]

2013-04-17 Thread tony mancill
On 03/15/2013 03:42 AM, Damian Minkov wrote: > Hi, > > we've just updated the package on mentors.debian.net following the > comments we recieved: > The dsc file can be found at: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jitsi/jitsi_2.0.4506.10553-1.dsc > > Regards > Damian Hello Damian, If

Bug#696899: can anybody sponsor an ITP for premake4 ?

2013-04-17 Thread Cameron Hart
Hi Jonathan, I've applied your changes and have updated to rules file to support get-orig-source. I've used CDBS to do this, it has support for downloading upstream tarballs and repacking them. I've uploaded a new version to mentors including your changes and my update rules file. I was in a bit

request for review of yubikey-val and yubikey-ksm

2013-04-17 Thread Simon Josefsson
Hi, We have uploaded packages that implement the YubiKey validation server (VAL) and YubiKey key storage module (KSM) to mentors. Daniel Pocock has done initial review and volunteered to sponsor the upload. I want the package to be in perfect condition, so if anyone has time to look at it, pleas

Bug#696899: can anybody sponsor an ITP for premake4 ?

2013-04-17 Thread Jonathan Dowland
Hi Cameron, Here's my latest version: http://jmtd.net/tmp/premake4_4.3%2brepack1-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130417171443.GA2648@debian

Bug#704131: marked as done (RFS: php-calendar/0.5.5-1 [ITP])

2013-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:22:31 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: php-calendar/0.5.5-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #704131, regarding RFS: php-calendar/0.5.5-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#696769: marked as done (RFS: inn2/2.5.3-1.1 [RC] [NMU])

2013-04-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:22:31 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: inn2/2.5.3-1.1 [RC] [NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #696769, regarding RFS: inn2/2.5.3-1.1 [RC] [NMU] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#696899: can anybody sponsor an ITP for premake4 ?

2013-04-17 Thread Cameron Hart
I will have some time tomorrow morning (UTC+10) to have a look at the things you've suggested here. Would you be able to send me your changes to have a look at? It might speed things up. I'm fine with you making the changes, I might not be able to get everything done in time for your Thursday eveni

Re: Bug#696899: can anybody sponsor an ITP for premake4 ?

2013-04-17 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 17/04/13 10:56, Boris Pek wrote: Hi, 1. repackaging the orig.tar.gz without src/host/lua-5.1.4, adding a suffix to the version e.g. +dfsg1 (so we end up with premake4_4.3+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz) A suffix +dfsg is used in another meaning. Maybe use +ds or +repack instead? +ds for Deb

Bug#696899: can anybody sponsor an ITP for premake4 ?

2013-04-17 Thread Boris Pek
Hi, > 1. repackaging the orig.tar.gz without src/host/lua-5.1.4, adding >a suffix to the version e.g. +dfsg1 (so we end up with >premake4_4.3+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz) A suffix +dfsg is used in another meaning. Maybe use +ds or +repack instead? Best wishes, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#696899: can anybody sponsor an ITP for premake4 ?

2013-04-17 Thread Jonathan Dowland
Hi Cameron, I've had time to look at -1 this morning on the train into work - I'll next have time to do some Debian stuff on Thursday evening (UTC+1). I think we'll need to get rid of the embedded copy of lua in the premake4 source tarball. This means 1. repackaging the orig.tar.gz without src/