Bug#705237: RFS: python-heatclient/0.2.2-1 [ITP] -- client library and CLI for OpenStack Heat

2013-04-13 Thread Prach Pongpanich
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > I'd rather not rely on existence of nosetests-2.X scripts[0], and use this > instead: > ... do python$$pyversion /usr/bin/nosetests -v; done > Thanks again, latest commit and upload: - set -e ; for pyversion in $(shell pyversions -vr); d

Bug#705237: RFS: python-heatclient/0.2.2-1 [ITP] -- client library and CLI for OpenStack Heat

2013-04-13 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Prach Pongpanich , 2013-04-12, 15:16: I hope lintian4python will soon move to sid. :-) Certainly not before wheezy is released. :) Any reason for not running tests at build time? Tests love begin run! Enable run tests at build time. +override_dh_auto_test: +ifeq (,$(filter nocheck,$(DEB_

Bug#705232: RFS: logic-analyzer-rpi/0.1.1-1 [ITP]

2013-04-13 Thread peter green
Anton Gladky wrote: I would agree with that. But there is a problem of package building. It means, we can upload only the binary-version (source-based uploads are still not implemented in Debian unfortunately), which was built on armel, what is not always simple or difficult. Also if the package

Re: Bug#705192: RFS: sosreport/2.3-2 ITP

2013-04-13 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Adam Stokes , 2013-04-11, 21:12: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sosreport/sosreport_2.3+git20130411-1.dsc lintian4python emits: w: sosreport: inconsistent-use-of-tabs-and-spaces-in-indentation usr/share/pyshared/sos/plugins/__init__.py:252 w: sosreport: inconsistent-use-of-tab

Bug#679439: marked as done (RFS: lightspeed/1.2a-9 [QA] -- Shows how objects moving at relativistic speeds look like)

2013-04-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:22:30 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: lightspeed/1.2a-9 [QA] -- Shows how objects moving at relativistic speeds look like has caused the Debian Bug report #679439, regarding RFS: lightspeed/1.2a-9 [QA] -- Shows how objects moving at rela

Bug#705360: RFS: pcapfix/0.7.2-1 [ITP]

2013-04-13 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pcapfix" * Package name: pcapfix Version : 0.7.2-1 Upstream Author : Robert Krause * URL : http://f00l.de/pcapfix * License : GPL3 Section

Bug#705257: ITP missing for package bittwist with RFS 705257

2013-04-13 Thread Eriberto
Thanks Mònica and Bart. The package already fixed and refreshed in mentors.debian.net. URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bittwist/bittwist_2.0-1.dsc I need a sponsor now. Thanks a lot in advance! Eriberto - Brazil 2013/4/13 Bart Martens > In my opinion, yes. It could be usef

Bug#705232: RFS: logic-analyzer-rpi/0.1.1-1 [ITP]

2013-04-13 Thread Anton Gladky
I would agree with that. But there is a problem of package building. It means, we can upload only the binary-version (source-based uploads are still not implemented in Debian unfortunately), which was built on armel, what is not always simple or difficult. Also if the package will require NMU, one

Bug#705257: ITP missing for package bittwist with RFS 705257

2013-04-13 Thread Eriberto
Sorry... 's/It will need/Will it need/'. 2013/4/13 Eriberto > Hi Mònica, > > Bittwist already exists in stable and old-stable. It will need an ITP??? > Can you sponsor for me??? > > Thanks a lot in advance. > > Eriberto - Brazil > > > > 2013/4/13 Mònica Ramírez > >> According to [0], bittwist

Bug#705257: ITP missing for package bittwist with RFS 705257

2013-04-13 Thread Eriberto
Hi Mònica, Bittwist already exists in stable and old-stable. It will need an ITP??? Can you sponsor for me??? Thanks a lot in advance. Eriberto - Brazil 2013/4/13 Mònica Ramírez > According to [0], bittwist has not its corresponding ITP bug. > Please, could you file it? > > Thanks for your w

Re: Migrate packages from unstable to testing

2013-04-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Игорь Пашев wrote: > Could anybody point me to the way how package migration from unstable to > testing > is implemented in Debian. I need very simple scheme: > > 1. Upload to "unstable" (not Debian, of course) > 2. Iff a package if XXX days old on unstable, add t

Migrate packages from unstable to testing

2013-04-13 Thread Игорь Пашев
Could anybody point me to the way how package migration from unstable to testing is implemented in Debian. I need very simple scheme: 1. Upload to "unstable" (not Debian, of course) 2. Iff a package if XXX days old on unstable, add this package to "testing" (like if this package is uploaded to

Bug#705257: ITP missing for package bittwist with RFS 705257

2013-04-13 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
According to [0], bittwist has not its corresponding ITP bug. Please, could you file it? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#702032: RFS: authprogs/0.1-1 [ITP #616126]

2013-04-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > the one which I decided to place in /etc/default defines loglevel and > location of authptogs.conf > and I think that /etc/defaults is a good place for it. > and second which can be in /etc/authprogs.conf or > /etc/authprogs/authprogs.con