Re: Packaging virtual machine images .ova?

2013-03-01 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 06:30:27AM +, adrelanos wrote: > >> Many users having trouble downloading the (rather big) images. > >> (Download > >> corruption, network breakdown...) > > > > [...] > > > >> If it could be installed with a "apt-get install whonix", that would > >> be > >> much better t

Re: Packaging virtual machine images .ova?

2013-03-01 Thread adrelanos
Andrey Rahmatullin: > On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 03:57:57AM +, adrelanos wrote: >> Many users having trouble downloading the (rather big) images. (Download >> corruption, network breakdown...) > > [...] > >> If it could be installed with a "apt-get install whonix", that would be >> much better t

Re: Packaging virtual machine images .ova?

2013-03-01 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 03:57:57AM +, adrelanos wrote: > Many users having trouble downloading the (rather big) images. (Download > corruption, network breakdown...) [...] > If it could be installed with a "apt-get install whonix", that would be > much better than manually downloading. Not re

Re: Why is it so hard to get sponsors.....?

2013-03-01 Thread PICCORO McKAY Lenz
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Hi Lenz, Cheers > > > with time, DDs tend to meet loved ones, i have too, also I have a couple, just one, not several, and I am responsible .. a'n my loves use in mayority linux, not window-like over linux > > make children, be promoted

Bug#662955: marked as done (RFS: rubyripper/0.6.2-3 [ITP] -- audio extractor)

2013-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:20:27 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: rubyripper/0.6.2-3 [ITP] -- audio extractor has caused the Debian Bug report #662955, regarding RFS: rubyripper/0.6.2-3 [ITP] -- audio extractor to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Re: Packaging virtual machine images .ova?

2013-03-01 Thread adrelanos
Arno Töll: > Hi, > > On 02.03.2013 03:17, adrelanos wrote: >> is it possible to package Virtual Machine images, such as Virtual Box >> .ova images? > > Possible? Surely. > What would the benefit be, though? What are you trying > to achieve? Whonix [1] is a Debian derivative, which I maintain. I

Re: Packaging virtual machine images .ova?

2013-03-01 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 02.03.2013 03:17, adrelanos wrote: > is it possible to package Virtual Machine images, such as Virtual Box > .ova images? Possible? Surely. What would the benefit be, though? What are you trying to achieve? -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID:

Packaging virtual machine images .ova?

2013-03-01 Thread adrelanos
Hi, is it possible to package Virtual Machine images, such as Virtual Box .ova images? Has ever anyone done something like this? I haven't found any in the repository and I haven't found any discussion about this. Cheers, adrelanos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.deb

Re: Changelog etiquette for upstream patches

2013-03-01 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 10:05:52PM +, Tony Houghton a écrit : > > The thing is there isn't a separate patch in the debian packaging or > elsewhere in the pending release tarball because I've applied the patch > to the code upstream. Dear Tony, for changes made upstream, you can thank the con

Re: Getting involved as a maintainer

2013-03-01 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, 2013/3/1 Saulo Moraes : > So my quest is may someone help me to get involved? How or Who can support > me in my first package upload ? I am reading the documentation available but > I think is time to start in practice. alternatively, you can adopt any of orphaned packages [1]. Anton [1]

Bug#599788: Info received (Getting involved as a maintainer)

2013-03-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will rep

Re: Getting involved as a maintainer

2013-03-01 Thread Tony Houghton
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 14:02:44 -0300 Saulo Moraes wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to contribute with Debian, I am a professional developer but > will be better to start working as a maintainer. After check the "Debian > Packages that Need Lovin'" I have choose the "samsung-tools" as my first > expe

Re: Changelog etiquette for upstream patches

2013-03-01 Thread Tony Houghton
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:03:50 -0500 Ryan Kavanagh wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:54:24PM +, Tony Houghton wrote: > > As both the upstream and Debian maintainer for roxterm I'm unsure what > > to do about documenting a patch that was submitted by someone else to > > the upstre

Bug#702032: RFS: authprogs/0.1-1 [ITP #616126]

2013-03-01 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "authprogs" * Package name: authprogs Version : 0.1-1 Upstream Author : Brian Hatch * URL : http://www.hackinglinuxexposed.com/tools/authprogs/src/

Bug#701803: RFS: fadecut/0.1.2-1

2013-03-01 Thread Anton Gladky
On 03/01/2013 07:40 AM, Marco Balmer wrote: > Dear Anton, > > I've created the tarball with the following command: > > $ git archive --format=tar --prefix=fadecut-0.1.2/ 0.1.2 | bzip2 > > ../fadecut_0.1.2.orig.tar.bz2 I have simply downloaded a tar.gz from tags-page [1] > > Do I need to reques

Bug#700104: RFS: evemu/1.0.10-1 [ITP]

2013-03-01 Thread Jakub Wilk
(I don't intend to sponsor this. Sorry!) * Stephen M. Webb , 2013-02-08, 13:47: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/evemu/evemu_1.0.10-1.dsc w: evemu source: source-contains-python-bytecode python/evemu/testing/__init__.pyc w: evemu source: source-contains-python-bytecode python/evem

Re: Getting involved as a maintainer

2013-03-01 Thread Игорь Пашев
Hi, Saulo! I think this helps => http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALL-Q8ygm=3oov7yffufnoawegup1y1p28hje

Re: Getting involved as a maintainer

2013-03-01 Thread Saulo Moraes
Hi, I would like to contribute with Debian, I am a professional developer but will be better to start working as a maintainer. After check the "Debian Packages that Need Lovin'" I have choose the "samsung-tools" as my first experience and as I know I littler about it after install in my laptop..

Re: needing sponsor for blt: am I at that stage?

2013-03-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 2 March 2013 00:12, Paul Johnson wrote: > Hello, > > Its me again. Once again, I'm throwing myself on your mercy because > although I like programming and packaging, I am having a horrible time > finding my way through your web pages to adopt a package and keep it > up to date. > > So far I ha

Re: Changelog etiquette for upstream patches

2013-03-01 Thread Ryan Kavanagh
Hi Tony, On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:54:24PM +, Tony Houghton wrote: > As both the upstream and Debian maintainer for roxterm I'm unsure what > to do about documenting a patch that was submitted by someone else to > the upstream tracker. I would document this information using a DEP-3 header[0

Changelog etiquette for upstream patches

2013-03-01 Thread Tony Houghton
As both the upstream and Debian maintainer for roxterm I'm unsure what to do about documenting a patch that was submitted by someone else to the upstream tracker. I've applied the patch upstream but don't know the best way to credit the author in debian/changelog. Include his name? Not his email ad

Bug#701970: RFS: couriergrey/0.3.2-2

2013-03-01 Thread Marco Balmer
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "couriergrey" * Package name: couriergrey Version : 0.3.2-2 Upstream Author : Matthias Wimmer * URL : http://couriergrey.com/ * License : GPL-2 Section