Dear Anton,
I've created the tarball with the following command:
$ git archive --format=tar --prefix=fadecut-0.1.2/ 0.1.2 | bzip2 >
../fadecut_0.1.2.orig.tar.bz2
Do I need to request a RFS again after freeze time or will fadecut
migrated from experimental to unstable?
Thanks,
Marco
2013/2/28 A
Le Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:04:39PM -0430, PICCORO McKAY Lenz a écrit :
>
> I've noticed that some reports have response as "is not critical, is still
> working," or else "not reproducible", or better "u can made a patch u can
> made a fix u ca... u can.. u do that" co DD/DM has no time!! NO TI
Your message dated Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:35:52 +0100
with message-id <512fb198.1050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#701803: RFS: fadecut/0.1.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #701803,
regarding RFS: fadecut/0.1.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi Marco,
I have uploaded the package. But I used the "tar.gz"-tarball, which is
available on github, instead of "tar.bz2". Did you repack it yourself?
Thanks,
Anton
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Your message dated Thu, 28 Feb 2013 19:36:56 +0100
with message-id <512fa3c8.6090...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#701739: RFS: rrep/1.3.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #701739,
regarding RFS: rrep/1.3.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hi Arno,
the package is uploaded! Please, consider for future uploads using VCS
for package maintanance and add corresponding fields into debian/control.
Thanks,
Anton
On 02/28/2013 02:57 AM, Arno Onken wrote:
> Hi Anton and Sebastian,
>
> Thank you very much for your quick reply and your note
(I don't intend to sponsor this.)
* Stephen M. Webb , 2013-02-13, 11:34:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/geis/geis_2.2.15-1.dsc
s/python-geis/python3-geis/
In fact, dh_python3 won't even touch python-* packages.
XB-Python-Version is deprecated; please remove it.
s/python binding
in recent years the debian packagers have focused on licensing, setting
aside as much therefore important that the package works ..
I've noticed that some reports have response as "is not critical, is still
working," or else "not reproducible", or better "u can made a patch u can
made a fix u ca..
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
A long time ago, that I've sent a RFS request to debian-mentors [1].
Accidentally the package was removed by mentors [2] and I didn't
notice that. So I've uploaded it again. ITP bug for this package is
available at [3].
[1] http://li
Dear Anton,
Thanks a lot for your useful notes. I've applied all of these and
uploaded the package again to mentors.
I am glad, if you can have a look again into the package:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/fadecut
https://github.com/micressor/fadecut/commit/ea470e1eaa345fc405e0d22e2ff13e
Hi Paul,
thanks for your great analysis. I might like to stress explicitly one
item (even if I totally agree with all others in general)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:37:10PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Specialization:
>
> Debian contributors generally work on stuff they use or are otherwise
> are i
11 matches
Mail list logo
