Hi Cameron,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Cameron Hart wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "premake4"
>
> * Package name: premake4
> Version : 4.3-1
> Upstream Author : Jason Perkins and ind
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 696368 by 696899
Bug #696368 [wnpp] ITP: premake4 -- cross-platform build script generator
696368 was not blocked by any bugs.
696368 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 696368: 696899
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please
Hi,
I haven't looked at the three RC bugs you just filled, nor how you fixed
them, but
Le 28/12/2012 21:45, Roger Light a écrit :
> * Bumped standards release to 3.9.3. No changes needed.
> * Bumped dh compat to 9 to fix hardening-no-fortify-functions.
> * Fixed python-module-in-wrong-loca
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mosquitto"
* Package name: mosquitto
Version : 0.15-2
Upstream Author : Roger Light
* URL : http://mosquitto.org/
* License : 3 clause BSD
Section
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "premake4"
* Package name: premake4
Version : 4.3-1
Upstream Author : Jason Perkins and individual contributors
* URL : http://industriousone.com/premake
* License
I'm a bit late here, as the package has been already uploaded, but
anyway...
* Tobias Stefan Richter , 2012-12-19, 00:12:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nexus/nexus_4.3-svn1863-1.dsc
This version has an arch:all package in debian/control, but the
binary-indep target doesn't do
* Giulio Paci , 2012-12-27, 03:52:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sequitur-g2p/sequitur-g2p_0.0.r1668-1.dsc
The license has this additional clause:
Should a provision of no. 9 and 10 of the GNU General Public License be
invalid or become invalid, a valid provision is deemed to h
Your message dated Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:40:43 +0100
with message-id <20121228164043.ga...@jwilk.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#684434: RFS: yamcha/0.33-1 [ITP] -- General purpose
chunker annotator
has caused the Debian Bug report #684434,
regarding RFS: yamcha/0.33-1 [ITP] -- General purpose chunker
Your message dated Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:19:31 +0100
with message-id <20121228151931.GA21602@elende>
and subject line Re: Bug#696867: RFS: redhat-cluster/3.0.12-3.2+deb7u1 [RC]
[NMU] [TPU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #696867,
regarding RFS: redhat-cluster/3.0.12-3.2+deb7u1 [RC] [NMU] [TPU]
to b
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #696867 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: redhat-cluster/3.0.12-3.2+deb7u1 [RC]
[NMU] [TPU]
Added tag(s) pending.
--
696867: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696867
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Ivo
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:35:59PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU to testing-proposed-updates for
> "redhat-cluster".
>
> It fixes RC bug #649068 (rg
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU to testing-proposed-updates for
"redhat-cluster".
It fixes RC bug #649068 (rgmanager and resource-agents: error when trying to
install together).
It was pre-approved by the release team:
http:
12 matches
Mail list logo