Re: Deb Package Question

2012-11-26 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:41:00PM -0800, AllowOverride wrote: > Hello, I am trying to package up a folder that has two more folders and > is a self contained program. > > i have tried debuild, dpkg-buildpackage, all sorts of deb build this and > thats, and well its really hard to package up somet

Processed: retitle to RFS: bilibop/0.4.4 (ITP #675467)

2012-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675532 RFS: bilibop/0.4.4 (ITP #675467) Bug #675532 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: bilibop/0.4.3 (ITP #675467) Changed Bug title to 'RFS: bilibop/0.4.4 (ITP #675467)' from 'RFS: bilibop/0.4.3 (ITP #675467)' > stop Stopping processing here.

Deb Package Question

2012-11-26 Thread AllowOverride
Hello, I am trying to package up a folder that has two more folders and is a self contained program. i have tried debuild, dpkg-buildpackage, all sorts of deb build this and thats, and well its really hard to package up something. now im sure it's easy for some of you, but remember this is a prog

Bug#694431: marked as done (RFS: couchdb/1.2.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC])

2012-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:52:08 + with message-id <20121126225208.gb11...@master.debian.org> and subject line RFS: couchdb/1.2.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #694431, regarding RFS: couchdb/1.2.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#694431: RFS: couchdb/1.2.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2012-11-26 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Hi, > > version 1.2.0-3 of couchdb already uploaded. > (Literally just now) > In this version, the problem of SIGHUP is corrected. > Righto. If you feel this sponsorship request is no longer needed, please feel free to close the bug

Bug#694431: RFS: couchdb/1.2.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2012-11-26 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, version 1.2.0-3 of couchdb already uploaded. In this version, the problem of SIGHUP is corrected. Best regards, Nobuhiro On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > I'm on the way into work, but I'm interested. Someone else feel free to > sponsor, but ill hit this tonight i

Bug#677935: Bug#505924: cwm

2012-11-26 Thread Nicholas Bamber
James. I still have a few issues: 1.) I didn't notice it first time but the last paragraph of the long description is a bit like advertising. 2.) The upstream changelog issue is still there. I seem to recall suggesting some solutions but at the least there should be a lintian override. 3

Processed: fits: block ITP 694418 by RFS 694464

2012-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 694418 by 694464 Bug #694418 [wnpp] ITP: fits -- Java library for the I/O handling of FITS files 694418 was not blocked by any bugs. 694418 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 694418: 694464 > stop Stopping processing here.

Bug#694464: RFS: fits/1.10.0-1 [ITP]

2012-11-26 Thread Florian Rothmaier
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fits" * Package name: fits Version : 1.10.0-1 Upstream Author : Thomas A. McGlynn * URL : http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/heasarc/fits/java/ * License

Processed: your mail

2012-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 694459 by 694308 Bug #694459 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: lcdf-typetools/2.92+dfsg1-1.1 [NMU] [RC] 694459 was not blocked by any bugs. 694459 was blocking: 694352 Added blocking bug(s) of 694459: 694308 > End of message, stopping processing h

Processed: block

2012-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 694459 Bug #694352 [lcdf-typetools] [lcdf-typetools] lcdf-typetool include non free adobe data; glyph list 694352 was not blocked by any bugs. 694352 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 694352: 694459 -- 694352: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Bug#694431: RFS: couchdb/1.2.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2012-11-26 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
I'm on the way into work, but I'm interested. Someone else feel free to sponsor, but ill hit this tonight ig no one does On Nov 26, 2012 7:45 AM, "Dominik George" wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "couchdb"

Bug#694431: RFS: couchdb/1.2.0-2.1 [NMU] [RC]

2012-11-26 Thread Dominik George
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "couchdb". The upload would fix RC bug #692295. * Package name: couchdb Version : 1.2.0-2.1 * URL : http://couchdb.apache.org/ * License : Apache-2.0 Sec

Re: How to specify a >= X < Y Depends (Was: Packaging GNU Health)

2012-11-26 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-11-26 08:59, Emilien Klein wrote: > [...] >> >> I believe it is quite valid to use: >> >> tryton (>= 2.4~), tryton (<< 2.5~) >> >> At least lintian4python uses this approach (rather than breaks/conflicts >> etc). >> >> ~Niels >> >> PS: The "~" is there to handle the case where tryton migh

Re: How to specify a >= X < Y Depends (Was: Packaging GNU Health)

2012-11-26 Thread Emilien Klein
Thanks Niels and Michael, 2012/11/26 Niels Thykier : > On 2012-11-26 08:24, Michael Tautschnig wrote: >> Hi all, >> >>> Hi Emilien, >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:54:59AM +0100, Emilien Klein wrote: ... As a general question: If package A depends on a specific set of releases (l