On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 10:52:43PM -0700, Vincent W. Chen wrote:
> Some questions:
> - According to Clause 5. (a) of
> http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_policy.txt, I might be able to
> request for an unblock from the release team.
I don't read anything about unblocks in rc_policy.txt. If you f
Hi,
Xiangfu lent me an NanoNote yesterday, I'll install Debian Sid on it
and test whether an image built on a Debian mipsel porterbox work with
the device. It that does not work, I can build a binary directly on
the device this time at least.
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fvwm". Per Bug #684395 and
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/10/msg00068.html, I've
decided to adopt this package, with permission from the maintainer
Manoj Srivastava.
Some notes:
-
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> The original tarball dir is noirotm-flvmeta-85a06a6/,
> therefore I repack it by rename dir to flvmeta-1.1.0/ without any
> changes to its contents.
>
> I'm not sure that the repacked tarball as in this case that I do is
> allowed or not ?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 676806 RFS: outguess/1:0.2-9
Bug #676806 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: outguess/1:0.2-8
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: outguess/1:0.2-9' from 'RFS: outguess/1:0.2-8'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 680546 RFS: cinnamon/1.6.1+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Bug #680546 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: cinnamon/1.6.1-1 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: cinnamon/1.6.1+dfsg-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
cinnamon/1.6.1-1 [ITP]'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please con
Sébastien,
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> Why did you choose gnutls ? Your code seems to be using the openssl
> one. And your copyright is explicitely setup to deal with openssl
> exception anyway ?
Another set of minor comments.
1.
$ man -l -k docs/orthanc.1
docs/or
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:20:12 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: muffin/1.1.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #680544,
regarding RFS: muffin/1.1.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hello and thank you very much for your review!
On Sunday 07 October 2012 09:09:28 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> * I'd prefer the package to target experimental as of now; upload to
> unstable will follow the release of wheezy
It makes sense. Done.
> * I don't see the point of including session d
Hello !
Here are my comments on the eyefiserver package, as it is now.
I don't have any means to check it works fine on my system, as I
lack the corresponding hardware.
There are several minor details to fix:
* I'd prefer the package to target experimental as of now; upload to
unstabl
10 matches
Mail list logo
