Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "muffin". This is the window
manager of Cinnamon, the desktop environment developed by the Linux Mint
team. It is a requirement for getting Cinnamon in Debian.
(http://bugs.debian.org/657395)
* Package name: muffin
Version :
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 680546 RFS: cinnamon/1.5.2-1 [ITP]
Bug #680546 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: cinnamon/1.4+up3+repack-1 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: cinnamon/1.5.2-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
cinnamon/1.4+up3+repack-1 [ITP]'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
retitle 680546 RFS: cinnamon/1.5.2-1 [ITP]
thanks
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cinnamon". This is the
desktop environment developed by the Linux Mint team which is basically
a fork of gnome-shell in order to have the feeling of GNOME2 while
having the modern in
Hi all
Some time ago it was filed a 'serious' bug against the package kstars-data-
extra-tycho2 that I maintain. The seriousness of the bug was related to the
possibility of copyright infringement. Bug number is #681654.
I've cleared the doubt with a change to the Copyright file that now explici
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 647090 by 683184
Bug #647090 [wnpp] ITA: suckless-tools -- simple commands for minimalistic
window
647090 was not blocked by any bugs.
647090 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 647090: 683184
> stop
Stopping processing here
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "suckless-tools"
* Package name: suckless-tools
Version : 39-1
Upstream Author : Suckless community (multiple authors)
* URL : http://suckless.org
* License
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 08:05:06PM -0300, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> > > i've prepared a QA upload for canna, it fixes the RC bug #681756.
> >
> > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/canna/canna_3.7p3-10.dsc
> >
> > thank you for your works, but i am afraid it does not fix RC b
Hi,
Is there a way to make CDBS and its debhelper class not build a
particular binary package? With debhelper alone, I'd just use the
-N/--no-package option.
I've tried adding that option to DH_OPTIONS, and I've tried overriding
DEB_ALL_PACKAGES after the CDBS class include lines as follows (whe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 680544 RFS: muffin/1.0.6-1 [ITP]
Bug #680544 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: muffin/1.0.3-1 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: muffin/1.0.6-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS: muffin/1.0.3-1
[ITP]'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:50:37 +0200
with message-id <20120729135037.ga8...@jwilk.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#666243: RFS: peg/0.1.9-1 [ITP] -- recursive-descent
parser generators for C
has caused the Debian Bug report #666243,
regarding RFS: peg/0.1.9-1 [ITP] -- recursive-descent
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:09:41AM +, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
> I maile dyou with the question,
Please forward that e-mail to 675...@bugs.debian.org .
>
> You say some file are not bsd,
I guess that you mean this part :
| You write in debian/copyright that pg_top.c has the BSD lic
O didn't get a correct url
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bas van den Dikkenberg
Pgp: Key-ID: C9710323 Fingerprint: B7F2A4B44758A08D6594F7762270C518C9710323
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Bart Martens [mailto:ba...@master.debian.org] Namens Bart Martens
Verzonden: zondag 29 juli 2012 8:45
Aan:
I maile dyou with the question,
You say some file are not bsd, I don't see it mentiond in the file.
Can you point to me witch lic it is ?
Hand how you determend that.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bas van den Dikkenberg
Pgp: Key-ID: C9710323 Fingerprint: B7F2A4B44758A08D6594F7762270C518C9710323
Done. The RFS bug is #683150.
Best regards,
Tobias Hansen
Am 29.07.2012 09:28, schrieb Bart Martens:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> I see on 673770 that you request sponsorship for an NMU, and don't see Torsten
> Werner object against that. You may want to upload the package to
> mentors.debian.net for more
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 673770 with 683150
Bug #673770 [libcap2-bin] libcap2-bin: modifying files from another package
Bug #672940 [libcap2-bin] libcap2-bin left pam_cap config: PAM adding faulty
module: pam_cap.so
673770 was not blocked by any bugs.
673770 was no
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my patch fixing the RC bug #673770/#672940 in
the package "libcap2".
I asked in #673770 on July 6 for someone to upload the fix and the maintainer
didn't object.
* Package name: libcap2
Hi Tobias,
I see on 673770 that you request sponsorship for an NMU, and don't see Torsten
Werner object against that. You may want to upload the package to
mentors.debian.net for more visibility.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
17 matches
Mail list logo