Bug#661533: marked as done (RFS: postfix-cluebringer/2.0.11-2 -- anti-spam plugin for Postfix)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2012 05:56:01 + with message-id <20120725055601.ga8...@master.debian.org> and subject line RFS: postfix-cluebringer has caused the Debian Bug report #661533, regarding RFS: postfix-cluebringer/2.0.11-2 -- anti-spam plugin for Postfix to be marked as done. This me

Re: Taking over maintainership of gringotts

El 24/07/12 08:09, Bart Martens escribió: > Other sponsors are welcome to review and upload these packages at any time > without talking to me. > For sure. Sorry. >> >> Bart, I made the changes requested in your comments but I'm not sure if >> I have to re-upload the packages bumping a new revis

[k...@roeckx.be: Bug#680436: sra-sdk: FTBFS: gcc/i386/atomic32.h:125:5: error: impossible constraint in 'asm']

Hi, I tagged this bug help because I admit I do not have any clue about assembler programming and atomic operations. I did also forewarded the problem upstream. Any hint would be welcome Andreas. - Forwarded message from Kurt Roeckx - Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:34:41 +0200 From:

Re: Backporting a multi-arched package

Hello Martin, Remove multi-arch support: debian/control: * remove lines with "Multi-Arch:" * remove lines with "Pre-Depends: * Move back to dephelper (>= 8) debian/compat: * Move back to "8" debian/rules: * Remove lines which looks like support for multi-arch... debian/*.install: * chang

Processed: clean-compiler: block ITP 680061 by RFS 682680

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 680061 by 682680 Bug #680061 [wnpp] ITP: clean-compiler - The Clean language compiler 680061 was not blocked by any bugs. 680061 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 680061: 682680 > stop Stopping processing here. Please cont

Processed: Re: Bug#682680: RFS: clean-compiler/2.4-1 [ITP] -- The Clean language compiler

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package sponsorship-requests Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'sponsorship-requests' Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests' > severity 682680 wishlist Bug #682680 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: clean

Bug#682680: RFS: clean-compiler/2.4-1 [ITP] -- The Clean language compiler

package sponsorship-requests severity 682680 wishlist user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 682680 not-fit-for-wheezy thanks On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:55:49PM +0200, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for n

Re: nbc package has been removed from Mentors

Hi, Dňa Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:34:55 +0200 George Danchev napísal: > Of course, you should try again. Just put some more salt, in hope to > whet the prospective sponsor's appetite. thanks, i will wait some time now. IMO it seems as useless to try it in freeze time. regards -- Slavko http://sla

Re: Help needed with dh_python2 and dh_python3

On 07/24/2012 12:12 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Michael (2012.07.24_10:15:51_+0200) >> I have a package that installs a few Python scripts and utility modules >> which are compatible with both, python2 and python3. The build system >> does not use distutils, it just copies the files into >> /usr

Re: Help needed with dh_python2 and dh_python3

Hi Michael (2012.07.24_10:15:51_+0200) > I have a package that installs a few Python scripts and utility modules > which are compatible with both, python2 and python3. The build system > does not use distutils, it just copies the files into > /usr/share/pyshared//. That's probably not ideal. pysha

Re: Help needed in gcc-4.7 - cython issue

Hi, On 24/07/12 09:02, Andreas Tille wrote: > $ gcc-4.7 -I/usr/include/python2.6 -c python-code/support-code/_sparsemat.cpp > -std=c++0x > python-code/support-code/_sparsemat.cpp: In function ‘void > __Pyx_RaiseArgtupleInvalid(const char*, int, Py_ssize_t, Py_ssize_t, > Py_ssize_t)’: > python-c

Re: Help needed with dh_python2 and dh_python3

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Michael Wild wrote: [snip] > Anybody got a clue as to what I'm doing wrong here? Do I need to add an > extra binary python3-foo package? As far as I'm aware, yes, you have to add an extra binary in debian/control if you want to build both python2 and python3 packa

Help needed with dh_python2 and dh_python3

Hi all I have a package that installs a few Python scripts and utility modules which are compatible with both, python2 and python3. The build system does not use distutils, it just copies the files into /usr/share/pyshared//. Now, I figured it would be as easy as * adding a build-dependency on p

Help needed in gcc-4.7 - cython issue

Hi, I did run into some trouble with a fresh package which is prepared in SVN at Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-biom-format/trunk/ You can obtain the source via `uscan --force-download` or `make -f debian/rules get-orig-source` . The package builds nicely whe