Rustom Mody writes:
> I use and am interested in packaging the C interpreter
> http://www.linuxbox.com/tiki/node/149
> 1. Its not under GPL but a 'creative licence'
>From the homepage, and the source, this 'creative license' appears to be
the Artistic License, used by, for example, Perl. I do n
I use and am interested in packaging the C interpreter
http://www.linuxbox.com/tiki/node/149
Before spending significant time on it, I thought I would ask if this would
be acceptable as a debian package
Some possible issues:
1. Its not under GPL but a 'creative licence'
2. It build does not use a
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a new version of Jampal. The previous
sponsor of Jampal was Kilian Krause
* Package name : jampal
Version : 02.01.06+dfsg1-1
Upstream Author : Peter Bennett < pgbenn...@co
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jul 2012 21:14:18 +
with message-id <20120720211418.gh16...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: grive/0.2.0-1 [ITP #675310]
has caused the Debian Bug report #681444,
regarding RFS: grive/0.2.0-1 [ITP #675310]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 20/07/12 17:14, Satoru KURASHIKI a écrit :
> hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Thibaut Paumard
> wrote:
>> package sponsorship-requests user
>> sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 679344
>> not-fit-for-wheezy
>
>> Now that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 665354 RFS: viennacl/1.3.0-1 (for experimental)
Bug #665354 [sponsorship-requests] viennacl/1.3.0-1 (for experimental)
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: viennacl/1.3.0-1 (for experimental)' from
'viennacl/1.3.0-1 (for experimental)'
> stop
Stopp
hi,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Thibaut Paumard
wrote:
> package sponsorship-requests
> user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
> usertags 679344 not-fit-for-wheezy
> Now that the freeze has started, this package is not fit for wheezy.
> During freeze, it is generally better to upload
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org (was
them...@users.sourceforge.net).
> usertags 665354 not-for-wheezy
Usertags were: not-fit-for-wheezy.
Usertags are now: not-for-wheezy not-f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
package sponsorship-requests
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 679344 not-fit-for-wheezy
thanks
Hi,
Now that the freeze has started, this package is not fit for wheezy.
During freeze, it is generally better to upload new upstre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 19/07/12 21:30, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:27:01PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 04:57:44PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-request
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:29:27 +0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: glipper/2.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #679335,
regarding RFS: glipper/2.3-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
11 matches
Mail list logo
